Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Tasmania as Little England and the Social Construction of Landscape

Bibliographic Data

ID12353164
AuthorsMax Staples (corresponding author)
Year2003
Volume13
Issue3
Pages312-329
Publication date2003-01-01
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueRural Society (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1037-1656 • E-ISSN: 2204-0536
PublisherTaylor & Francis (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.5172/rsj.13.3.312
OpenAlexW2066203389
LanguageEN
Citations received3
References cited3

‘Social construction’ is the theory, which explains that groups of people make up views of the world which reflect their own interests. Objective reality, runs the theory, is not knowable. Every view of the world is a social construction.Recent academic literature has taken previously reliable terms such as “drought” and “family” as well as more abstract categories like “crime” and “madness” and reinterpreted them as the variable product of a certain society or subgroup operating at a certain time. Writing about the Australian landscape, social constructivists have claimed the existence of “European” and “Aboriginal” views.Social construction can be questioned on two grounds. One is that external physical reality does indeed exist and has some objective features which can be recognised by all sensible observers. The second, which is not necessarily contradictory, is that humans vary in myriad ways, and their views are determined by many more factors than simple bi-polar oppositions drawn on the basis of race or gender.In this paper I provide a case study of social construction by looking at the argument that European settlers socially constructed the Tasmanian landscape as a type of Little England. I provide historical evidence that early European inhabitants of Tasmania had a range of views about the landscape.While some might have regarded Tasmania as similar to England, or tried to recreate aspects of England, others did not. Where construction has taken place it has been by those recent academic authors who have retrospectively constructed fictional European and Aboriginal views by taking selected individual comments as universal and ignoring evidence to the contrary, in order to sustain their own beliefs. To argue that a thing is “socially constructed” is itself an ideological view about how meaning occurs

Argument (complex analysis · Political science · Project commissioning · Publishing · Social constructionism · Social science · Sociology · Geographies of human-animal interactions · Law · Pacific and Southeast Asian Studies

  • Scaling the Rural

    Andrew Gorman-Murray, K Darian-Smith et al.•Australian Humanities Review•2008

  • Censorship Through Explanation

    Open Access•Luke Tipene•Space and Culture•2022

  • Considering the Limits of Rural Place Making Opportunities

    Matthew W Rofe•Landscape Research•2013

  • Imagined country

    John R Short•Imagined country•1991

  • The Cambridge Dictionary of Australian Places

    Open Access•Richard Appleton, Barbara Appleton•Cambridge Dictionary of…•1993

  • A Statistical, Historical, and Political Description of the Colony of New South Wales, and its Dependent Settlements in Van Diemen's Land

    Open Access•William Charles Wentworth•Statistical, Historical, and…•2011

Citations per year0.17
Citation span2008 - 2022 (15)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae