Civil courts and Covid-19
Challenges and opportunities in Australia
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 12354070 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Joe Mcintyre (0000-0003-2267-9600, UniSA Justice & Society, University of South Australia, Australia, corresponding author), Anna Olijnyk (0000-0003-0140-7657, Adelaide Law School, The University of Adelaide, Australia), Kieran Pender (0000-0002-5100-5827, Centre for International and Public Law, The Australian National University, Australia) |
| Year | 2020 |
| Volume | 45 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 195-201 |
| Publication date | 2020-09-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Alternative Law Journal (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1037-969X • E-ISSN: 2398-9084 |
| Publisher | SAGE Publishing (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.1177/1037969x20956787 |
| OpenAlex | W3083651996 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 7 |
This article provides an overview of the response of Australian courts to the COVID-19 crisis, and critically examines a number of structures and systemic issues that arise from the shift to the online deliver of justice. It places the current responses in the context of the emerging literature regarding online dispute resolution, and draws upon that literature to consider issues including open justice, symbolism and ‘court architecture’ in the digital space, technological limitations, access to justice and issues of systemic bias. It argues that by examining these issues, the present crisis will help map opportunities for future reform
Alternative dispute resolution · Context (archaeology · Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19 · Dispute resolution · Economic Justice · Geography · Law and economics · Online dispute resolution · Political science · Project commissioning · Public relations · Publishing · Sociology · Computer Science · Dispute Resolution and Class Actions · Law · Law in Society and Culture · Medical Malpractice and Liability Issues
Technology and access to justice during the pandemic
How has the Covid19 pandemic impacted the courts of law? Evidence from Brazil
Virtual court hearings and therapeutic jurisprudence
Imagining Resilient Courts
Public perceptions of remote courts and equal access
Justice reimagined
Communication Type In Trial
| Unique citing works | 7 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 1,4 |
| Citation span | 2021 - 2026 (6) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 6 |