What Can Mainstream Courts Learn from Problem-Solving Courts
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 12354565 |
|---|---|
| Authors | M King (0000-0003-0446-7698, Monash University, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2007 |
| Volume | 32 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 91-95 |
| Publication date | 2007-06-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Alternative Law Journal (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1037-969X • E-ISSN: 2398-9084 |
| Publisher | SAGE Publishing (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.1177/1037969x0703200206 |
| OpenAlex | W1516460197 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 1 |
| References cited | 5 |
This article analyses key principles underlying problem-solving court processes in the light of therapeutic jurisprudence and suggests how mainstream courts can use them. Therapeutic jurisprudence -- the study of the effect of laws and legal processes on well-being -- has become problem-solving courts' underlying ethos. It suggests that findings from the behavioural sciences can inform the development of legal processes. Therapeutic jurisprudence principles also underlie another court innovation: Indigenous sentencing courts
Ethos · Jurisprudence · Mainstream · Political science · Psychotherapist · Therapeutic jurisprudence · Counseling Practices and Supervision · Law · Legal Education and Practice Innovations · Psychology · Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
| Citations per year | 0.5 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2024 - 2024 (1) |
| Highly cited | No |