Saltar al contenido principal

ETHNOS_APP

Inicio • Búsqueda • Revistas • Lista 0

Introduction

Performing Sin—Perversion, Insufficiency, and Excess

Datos Bibliográficos

ID12370031
AutoresMichael LeVan (Cavan General Hospital, autor de correspondencia), Daniel Makagon (0000-0003-1347-2819, Moscow State University of Technologies and Management named after K.G. Razumovskiy, autor de correspondencia)
Año2005
Volumen26
Número1
Páginas1-4
Fecha de publicación2005-12-13
Peer ReviewedSí
Open AccessNo
TipoARTICLE
RevistaText and Performance Quarterly (JOURNAL)
Identificadores de la revistaISSN: 1046-2937 • E-ISSN: 1479-5760
EditorialTaylor & Francis (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/10462930500382229
OpenAlexW2161892657
IdiomaEN
Citas recibidas1
Referencias citadas2

‘‘Every sin is the result of a collaboration,’’ claimed Seneca, observing that sin is both a cultural and an intersubjective process. Seneca’s pointed formula implies both cultural performances that maintain normative order and a collusive, furtive will to resist that order. Sin is, to be sure, a rhetorical construct*/but it is also a resource. It is simultaneously social and surreptitious. Above all others, the seven deadly sins have become emblematic for understanding many of the practices of everyday life (sometimes vaunted, sometimes reviled). Some have gone so far as to claim that the seven deadly sins illustrate the excesses and abuses of Western society as a whole (Lyman). With this in mind, we take as a starting point in this special issue that sin has long held a firm grasp on our cultural imagination. Internal battles between good and evil are at the very heart of most of our storytelling; external battles between good and evil comprise the bulk of our tales of history. The discourse and imagination surrounding the seven deadly sins is particularly dramatic because the stakes are drawn so high. As a product of Christian guides to proper living, the seven deadly sins are constructed as offenses against God’s will that lead to certain damnation and the death of the soul. They are literally deadly. These are the sins of anger, envy, gluttony, greed, lust, pride, and sloth. 1 The seven deadly sins are tied to personal behavior and decorum, articulating prohibitions concerning human desire. In his Inferno, Dante explains that the seven deadly sins are all failed relationships to love, articulated within the three relational categories of perversion, insufficiency, or excess. Whether understood as emotions or actions, as directed at self or other, or as spiritual or social matters, the seven deadly sins routinely enact relationships that cut to the heart of the onto-epistemic labors of performance. The contributors to this issue all engage Dante’s typology in one way or another to perform sin through perversion, insufficiency, and/or excess (of style, of topic, of method)

Perversion · Psychoanalysis · Philosophy · Psychology · Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought

  • Rituals of Harm

    Open Access•Ina Goel•Behavioral Sciences & the Law•2025

  • The Seven Deadly Sins

    James Aho, James A Aho et al.•Contemporary Sociology A Journal…•1979

  • The Seven Deadly Sins

    Michael Palencia-Roth, Michael Palencia‐roth et al.•Sociological Analysis•1979

Obras citantes distintas1
Citas por año1
Intervalo de citas2025 - 2025 (1)
Velocidad de citaciónrecent
Altamente citadoNo
Tipos de citaNeutras: 1
Ethnos_APP • Proyecto Open Source • Licencia MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidad y Cookies • Documentación de la API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código de la API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código del Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae