Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

John Marshall's Opinion in Marbury v. Madison Does Not Rely on a Misquoting of the Constitution

A Response to Rose

Bibliographic Data

ID12377014
AuthorsJeffrey Anderson (0000-0002-9632-7360, United States Air Force Academy, corresponding author), Jeffrey H Anderson
Year2004
Volume37
Issue2
Pages199-202
Publication date2004-04-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenuePS Political Science & Politics (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1049-0965 • E-ISSN: 1537-5935
PublisherCambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1017/s104909650400407x
OpenAlexW2169568309
LanguageEN
Citations received2
References cited2

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content

Constitution · Content (measure theory · Law and economics · Political science · Sociology · American Constitutional Law and Politics · Law · Legal and Constitutional Studies · Legal Systems and Judicial Processes · Mathematics

  • A Cláusula De Reserva De Plenário E O Controle Difuso De (In)constitucionalidade

    Open Access•João Batista Perígolo•Revista Foco•2025

  • Marbury v. Madison

    Open Access•Christopher B Budzisz•PS Political Science & Politics•2004

  • The Records of the Federal Convention of 1787

    Max Farrand•Harvard Law Review•1911

  • Marbury v. Madison

    Open Access•Winfield H Rose•PS Political Science & Politics•2003

Unique citing works2
Citations per year0,09
Citation span2004 - 2025 (22)
Citation velocityrecent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 2

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae