Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

The 2011 Debt-Ceiling Controversy and the 2012 US House Elections

Bibliographic Data

ID12377933
AuthorsJames E Monogan (0000-0002-1968-6052, corresponding author)
Year2015
Volume48
Issue3
Pages420-424
Publication date2015-06-19
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenuePS Political Science & Politics (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1049-0965 • E-ISSN: 1537-5935
PublisherCambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1017/s1049096515000177
OpenAlexW2498573942
LanguageEN
References cited16

This article considers how a key legislative vote—that is, the August 2011 vote to raise the federal debt ceiling—influenced the 2012 elections for the US House of Representatives. Two outcomes are analyzed: (1) the incumbents’ ability to retain their seats through the 2012 general election, and (2) their share of the two-party vote for members who faced a general-election competitor. In developing this study, the research design was registered and released publicly before the votes were counted in 2012. Therefore, this article also illustrates how study preregistration can work in practice for political science. The findings show that seat retention did not vary with the treatment; however, incumbents who voted against raising the debt ceiling earned an additional 2.4 percentage points of the two-party vote

Business · Ceiling (cloud · Debt · General election · House of Representatives · Legislature · Lower house · Parliament · Political science · Politics · Work (physics · Electoral Systems and Political Participation · Engineering · Law · Political Influence and Corporate Strategies · Public Administration · Social Policy and Reform Studies · Finance

  • The Elections of 2012

    Michael Nelson•The Elections of 2012•2014

  • Elbridge Gerry's Salamander

    Open Access•Gary W Cox, Jonathan Ned Katz•Elbridge Gerry's Salamander•2002

  • Senate Elections

    Open Access•Alan I Abramowitz, Alan Abramowitz et al.•Senate elections•1992

  • Multivariate Matching Methods That Are Monotonic Imbalance Bounding

    M Iacu, Stefano M Iacus et al.•Journal of the American…•2011

  • The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects

    Paul R Rosenbaum, Donald B Rubin•Biometrika•1983

  • Behind the Curve

    Open Access•Michael J Hanmer, Kerem Ozan Kalkan•American Journal of Political…•2013

  • Candidate Positioning in U.S. House Elections

    Stephen Ansolabehere, Jane Mcintosh Snyder et al.•American Journal of Political…•2001

  • Policy representation of constituency interests

    Open Access•Robert S Erikson, Gerald C Wright et al.•Political Behavior•1980

  • The perils of presidential support

    Open Access•D Brady, David W Brady et al.•Political Behavior•1996

  • Fishing, Commitment, and Communication

    Open Access•Michael Humphreys, Macartan Humphreys et al.•Political Analysis•2013

  • A Case for Registering Studies of Political Outcomes

    Open Access•James E Monogan•Political Analysis•2013

  • Electoral Incentives and Partisan Conflict in Congress

    Open Access•Laurel Harbridge, N Malhotra•American Journal of Political…•2011

  • The Electoral Costs of Party Loyalty in Congress

    Open Access•Jamie L Carson, Gregory Koger et al.•American Journal of Political…•2010

  • Out of Step, Out of Office

    Open Access•Brandice Canes-Wrone, D Brady et al.•American Political Science Review•2002

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae