Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Perestroika Ten Years After

Reflections on Methodological Diversity

Bibliographic Data

ID12378445
AuthorsDvora Yanow (0000-0002-1382-7504, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, corresponding author), Peregrine Schwartz-Shea (0000-0001-9049-3096, University of Utah)
Year2010
Volume43
Issue4
Pages741-745
Publication date2010-10-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenuePS Political Science & Politics (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1049-0965 • E-ISSN: 1537-5935
PublisherCambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1017/s1049096510001149
OpenAlexW2050093345
LanguageEN
Citations received4
References cited9

One of the primary concerns driving Perestroika was the hegemony of quantitative methods in American political science research, curricula, journals, and positions, to the exclusion of qualitative and interpretive approaches. In this article, we assess the contemporary methodological diversity of U.S. political science, at the APSA in particular, to see what, if anything, has changed over the last 10 years. This is an admittedly rough assessment, as the deadline for this symposium did not allow time to repeat the research projects that started Perestroika's and our own solo and joint efforts, the latter preceding and then intersecting with the former. We therefore give a broad overview of methods-directed activities, although we cannot help but see events through the lens of our own involvement in them, and that view is perforce partial

Curriculum · Diversity (politics · Engineering ethics · Hegemony · Political science · Politics · Social science · Sociology · Electoral Systems and Political Participation · Engineering · Law · Political Science Research and Education · Qualitative Comparative Analysis Research

  • Sex Work Politics

    Samantha Majic•Sex Work Politics•2014

  • Disseram que eu voltei americanizada

    Open Access•Adriano Codato, Mariana Lorencetti et al.•Revista de Sociologia e Política•2020

  • Legitimizing Political Science or Splitting the Discipline? Reflections on DA-RT and the Policy-making Role of a Professional Association

    Open Access•Peregrine Schwartz-Shea, Dvora Yanow•Politics & Gender•2016

  • Methodology Matters

    Open Access•Christina Harris, Christina V Harris et al.•International Studies Perspectives•2024

  • Logics of Critical Explanation in Social and Political Theory

    Jason Glynos, David Howarth•Logics of critical explanation in…•2007

  • Perspective—Making Doubt Generative

    Karen Locke, Karen Golden-Biddle et al.•Organization Science•2008

  • Rethinking Social Inquiry

    Henry E Brady, David Collier•Rethinking Social Inquiry•2010

  • Interpretation and Method

    Dvora Yanow, Peregrine Schwartz-Shea•Interpretation and Method•2015

  • Reforming Institutional Review Board Policy

    Open Access•Dvora Yanow, Peregrine Schwartz-Shea•PS Political Science & Politics•2008

  • Perestroika and the Journals

    Open Access•Gregory J Kasza•PS Political Science & Politics•2010

  • Introduction—Methodological Pluralism in Journals and Graduate Education? Commentaries on New Evidence

    Open Access•Peregrin Schwartz-Shea, Andre Bennett•PS Political Science & Politics•2003

Unique citing works4
Citations per year0,33
Citation span2014 - 2024 (11)
Citation velocityrecent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 4

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae