Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

E. E. Schattschneider, the New Deal, and the Rejection of the Responsible Party Doctrine

Bibliographic Data

ID12379637
AuthorsSidney M Milki (0000-0003-3413-6398, Brandeis University, corresponding author)
Year1992
Volume25
Issue2
Pages180-186
Publication date1992-06-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenuePS Political Science & Politics (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1049-0965 • E-ISSN: 1537-5935
PublisherCambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.2307/419704
OpenAlexW2328819568
LanguageEN
References cited4

E. E. Schattschneider's Party Government , published fifty years ago, is one of the early classics of behavioral political science. The enduring popularity of this book, however, stems less from its impressive analysis of the actual workings of American party politics than its advocacy of democratic reform. Party Government was a strong blow in behalf of “responsible party government,” a creed that has had an important influence on political science. Schattschneider later chaired the Committee on Political Parties of the American Political Science Association, which produced the famous report “Towards a More Responsible Two-Party System,” published in 1950. Much of the argument of the report was anticipated by Party Government , which advocated “party centralization” to overcome the local and sectional tendencies that defined traditional partisan politics in the United States (Schattschneider 1942; Committee on Political Parties 1950). Schattschneider considered political parties as perhaps the most archaic institutions in the United States: the American party system continued to operate as it had before the Civil War, that is, as two loose coalitions of state and local organizations, with very little national machinery and cohesion. The major parties were able to control the electoral process and bring people to the polls. Nevertheless, they failed to organize the nominees they elected to office into an effective, cohesive team for control of government. “Nearly all of the conflict and confusion of American government,” Schattschneider (1942, 30) claimed, “can be traced to the failure of the parties on this point.” With the growth of the federal government's responsibilities during the twentieth century, this failing of the traditional decentralized parties represented a distressing deterioration of representative democracy

Communism · Creed · Democracy · Doctrine · Government (linguistics · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Politics of the United States · Realigning election · Socialism · Sociology · State (computer science · Academic Freedom and Politics · Law · Public Administration

  • Progressive Democracy

    Sidney A Pearson•Reflections on American…•2017

  • Chip Off My Shoulder

    George E Mowry, Thomas L Stokes•The Mississippi Valley Historical…•1940

  • Toward a More Responsible Two-Party System

    Samuel J Eldersveld•The Western Political Quarterly•1951

  • "Politics, Administration, and the "New Deal

    Open Access•Luther Gulick•The Annals of the American…•1933

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae