A Reply to “Reducing Political Bias in Political Science Estimates”
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 12379898 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Daniel Maliniak (0000-0002-1741-2306, William & Mary, corresponding author), Rosemary Powers (0000-0003-1664-3695, University of Wisconsin–Madison), Barbara F Walter (0000-0002-2771-464X, University of California San Diego), Barbara Walter |
| Year | 2017 |
| Volume | 50 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 184-185 |
| Publication date | 2017-01-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | PS Political Science & Politics (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1049-0965 • E-ISSN: 1537-5935 |
| Publisher | Cambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1017/s1049096516002390 |
| OpenAlex | W2564840302 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 1 |
| References cited | 9 |
Zigerell (this issue) cites the findings of his recent reanalysis (Zigerell 2015) of the data in our 2013 study of the gender citation gap in the international relations literature to support his claim that our study showed a “preference for statistically-significant results.” We thank Zigerell for so closely engaging with our work. However, we note that he is focused on how his changes to our sample affect a single model in our original paper, highlight the fact that we reported statistically insignificant results when they arose in our original analyses, and review the findings of other recent re-analyses of our data. Ultimately, while we disagree with Zigerell’s conclusions about our work, we join Zigerell in calling for greater diversity in the discipline
Biology · Citation · CITES · Diversity (politics · Economics · Join (topology · Political science · Politics · Positive economics · Preference · Sample (material · Social science · Sociology · Statistics · Electoral Systems and Political Participation · Gender Politics and Representation · Law · Mathematics · Political Science Research and Education · Psychology
Comment on “Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science”
Political diversity will improve social psychological science
Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science
Is the gender citation gap in international relations driven by elite papers
Research Preregistration in Political Science
The Gender Citation Gap in International Relations
| Unique citing works | 1 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,17 |
| Citation span | 2020 - 2020 (1) |
| Citation velocity | historical |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 1 |