Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Introduction to Women's Political Involvement in the 100 Years since the Nineteenth Amendment

Bibliographic Data

ID12379946
AuthorsHeather L Ondercin (0000-0001-9403-7805, Appalachian State University, corresponding author), Ellen M Key (0000-0002-4840-9927, Appalachian State University)
Year2020
Volume53
Issue3
Pages465-469
Publication date2020-07-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenuePS Political Science & Politics (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1049-0965 • E-ISSN: 1537-5935
PublisherCambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1017/s1049096520000347
OpenAlexW3040831779
LanguageEN
References cited33

August 19, 2020, marks the centennial of ratification of the Nineteenth Amendment, which guaranteed that the right to vote could not be denied on the basis of sex. The Nineteenth Amendment did not radically transform women’s political activism; rather, it was a product of women’s political activism. Women won the franchise in a 72-year battle fought at both the state and national levels. By the time the Nineteenth Amendment was ratified, women had been voting for almost 50 years in localities where they already had secured the right to vote. 1 The 100th anniversary is an opportune time to reflect on women’s continued involvement in politics

Amendment · Ancient history · Battle · Centennial · Constitutional amendment · Political science · Politics · Ratification · State (computer science · Voting · American Constitutional Law and Politics · Electoral Systems and Political Participation · Gender Politics and Representation · History · Law

  • The Woman Suffrage Movement in America

    Open Access•Corrine M Mcconnaughy•Woman Suffrage Movement in America•2013

  • The Resistance

    Jacob S Hacker, David S Meyer et al.•Resistance•2018

  • The Political Consequences of Motherhood

    Jill S Greenlee•The political consequences of…•2014

  • Opting Out of Congress

    Open Access•Danielle M Thomsen•Opting Out of Congress•2017

  • Demarginalizing the Intersection of Race and Sex

    Kimberlé Crenshaw, Kimberlé W Crenshaw•Feminist Legal Theory•2018

  • Tea Party Women

    Melissa Deckman•Tea Party Women•2016

  • Forging the Franchise

    Open Access•Dawn Langan Teele•Forging the Franchise•2018

  • Distinct Identities

    N E Brown, Sarah Allen Gershon•Distinct Identities•2016

  • Explaining the Dynamics between the Women's Movement and the Conservative Movement in the United States

    Lee Ann Banaszak, Heather L Ondercin•Social Forces•2016

  • Is it a Chasm? Is it a Canyon? No, it is the Gender Gap

    Open Access•Heather L Ondercin•The Forum•2018

  • Ethnicity and the role of group consciousness

    Candis Watts Smith•Politics Groups and Identities•2013

  • The Trump majority

    Jane Y Junn•Politics Groups and Identities•2017

  • Straddling identities

    K Jurée Capers, Candis Watts Smith•Politics Groups and Identities•2015

  • Role models revisited

    Christina Wolbrecht, David E Campbell•Politics Groups and Identities•2017

  • A partisan gap in the supply of female potential candidates in the United States

    Open Access•Melody Crowder-Meyer, Benjamin E Lauderdale•Research & Politics•2014

  • Political Participation of Women of Color

    N E Brown•Women & Politics•2014

  • Can’t Buy Them Love

    Melody Crowder-Meyer, Rosalyn Cooperman•The Journal of Politics•2018

  • Shifting Standards

    Nichole M Bauer•The Journal of Politics•2020

  • See Jane Run

    David E Campbell, Christina Wolbrecht•The Journal of Politics•2006

  • Gendered Recruitment without Trying

    Melody Crowder-Meyer•Politics & Gender•2013

  • American Party Women

    Open Access•Tiffany D Barnes, Erin C Cassese•Political Research Quarterly•2017

  • Which Women Can Run? Gender, Partisanship, and Candidate Donor Networks

    Open Access•Danielle M Thomsen, Michele L Swers•Political Research Quarterly•2017

  • Terrorist Threat, Male Stereotypes, and Candidate Evaluations

    Open Access•Mirya R Holman, Jennifer L Merolla et al.•Political Research Quarterly•2016

  • Who Is Responsible for the Gender Gap? The Dynamics of Men’s and Women’s Democratic Macropartisanship, 1950–2012

    Open Access•Heather L Ondercin•Political Research Quarterly•2017

  • Measuring Stereotypes of Female Politicians

    Open Access•Monica C Schneider, Angela L Bos•Political Psychology•2014

  • Prominent Role Models

    Open Access•Christina Ladam, Jeffrey J Harden et al.•American Journal of Political…•2018

  • The Political Culture of the Democratic and Republican Parties

    Open Access•Jo Freeman•Political Science Quarterly•1986

  • Stay Woke

    Open Access•Christina Jackson•Contemporary Sociology A Journal…•2020

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOI
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae