Introduction—Political Scientists in McConnell v. FEC
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 12379962 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Jonathan S Krasno (Binghamton University, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2004 |
| Volume | 37 |
| Issue | 4 |
| Pages | 769-770 |
| Publication date | 2004-10-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | PS Political Science & Politics (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1049-0965 • E-ISSN: 1537-5935 |
| Publisher | Cambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1017/s104909650404510x |
| OpenAlex | W2171145690 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 3 |
The Supreme Court's sweeping decision in December, 2003, in McConnell v. FEC was as unexpected as it was dramatic. For months the conventional wisdom had been that the Court was certain to overturn one and possibly both of the main parts of the McCain-Feingold law, or otherwise substantially narrow the statue. Instead, the justices, by a slim 5-4 majority, did just the opposite; not only upholding the law but doing so in terms that virtually echoed the defendants' arguments. Proponents were stunned and thrilled. Opponents were appalled; Justice Scalia called it the “opening act of a national tragedy.” Both sides agreed, however, that the decision in McConnell stands as one of the most important campaign finance and First Amendment precedents in several decades
Art history · Campaign finance · Economic Justice · Law and economics · Political science · Politics · Sociology · Statue · Supreme court · Tragedy (event · Academic Freedom and Politics · History · Law · Political Influence and Corporate Strategies · Political Science Research and Education
| Highly cited | No |
|---|