Reducing the Burden of Manuscript Reviewing
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 12380683 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Richard G Niemi (University of Rochester, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2006 |
| Volume | 39 |
| Issue | 04 |
| Pages | 887-889 |
| Publication date | 2006-09-29 |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | PS Political Science & Politics (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1049-0965 • E-ISSN: 1537-5935 |
| Publisher | Cambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1017/s1049096506061130 |
| OpenAlex | W2039949056 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 1 |
If anecdotal evidence is to be believed, political scientists are much more heavily burdened with reviewing manuscripts submitted to professional journals than they were just a few years ago, even more than the expanded number of journals and journals that have expanded their numbers would suggest. Young faculty in particular feel this burden; rightly or wrongly, they feel they cannot refuse requests to review manuscripts because it may make it harder for them to publish in those very same journals. More than a few graduate students have also been asked to review papers, a practice one might question both because of the time it takes from budding researchers and because of questions it raises about the quality of reviews
Epistemology · Medical education · Political science · Public relations · Publication · Quality (philosophy · Innovative Teaching Methodologies in Social Sciences · Law · Medicine · Philosophy · Psychology
| Citations per year | 0.08 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2013 - 2013 (1) |
| Highly cited | No |