Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Senate Deliberation and the Future of Congressional Power

Bibliographic Data

ID12380697
AuthorsFrances Lee (0000-0002-9857-7494, University of Maryland, College Park, corresponding author)
Year2010
Volume43
Issue2
Pages227-229
Publication date2010-04-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenuePS Political Science & Politics (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1049-0965 • E-ISSN: 1537-5935
PublisherCambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1017/s104909651000003x
OpenAlexW1976530187
LanguageEN
Citations received4
References cited10

Current circumstances might seem to present real opportunities for Congress to reassert itself relative to its weakened role during George W. Bush's presidency. Large, unusually cohesive Democratic majorities in both chambers; unified government; and an administration staffed with people who know Congress well—all this might lead one to expect a productive working relationship permitting Congress wide scope of action. Nevertheless, the Senate's internal deliberative processes threaten to create difficulties so significant that they may outweigh these developments. Looking to the future of Congress, changes in Senate procedures and practices are important not only because of their effects on the institution's internal power structure. Left unchecked, they are also likely to have implications for the balance of power between the executive and legislative branches of government

Action (physics · Administration (probate law · Balance (ability · Deliberation · Democracy · Executive branch · Government (linguistics · Institution · Law and economics · Legislature · Political science · Politics · Power (physics · Presidency · Scope (computer science · Separation of powers · Sociology · Electoral Systems and Political Participation · Law · Political and Economic history of UK and US · Psychology · Public Administration

  • Legislative Obstruction

    Open Access•David R Mayhew•Perspectives on Politics•2010

  • On Separation of Powers and Obfuscation in US Supreme Court Opinions

    Open Access•Daniel Lempert•Journal of Law and Courts•2022

  • How the Supreme Court Alters Opinion Language to Evade Congressional Review

    Open Access•Ryan J Owens, Justin Wedeking et al.•Journal of Law and Courts•2013

  • Changing Senate Norms

    Mark E Owens, Mark Owens•PS Political Science & Politics•2018

  • The New Imperial Presidency

    Andrew Rudalevige•The New Imperial Presidency•2005

  • Parties and Leaders in the Postreform House

    David W Rohde•Parties and leaders in the…•1991

  • Power without Persuasion

    William G Howell•Power Without Persuasion•2003

  • The Broken Branch

    Thomas E Mann, Norman J Ornstein•The Broken Branch•2006

  • The Transformation of the U.S. Senate

    Barbara Sinclair•The transformation of the U.S.…•1990

  • Filibuster

    Gregory J Wawro, Eric Schickler•Filibuster•2013

  • Disjointed Pluralism

    Open Access•Garry Young•Political Science Quarterly•2002

  • Supermajority Rule in the U.S. Senate

    David R Mayhew•PS Political Science & Politics•2003

Unique citing works4
Citations per year0,25
Citation span2010 - 2022 (13)
Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 4

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae