Census 2000–Epilogue
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 12384367 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Thomas L Brunell (0000-0003-3077-5037, Binghamton University, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2001 |
| Volume | 34 |
| Issue | 4 |
| Pages | 813-814 |
| Publication date | 2001-10-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | PS Political Science & Politics (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1049-0965 • E-ISSN: 1537-5935 |
| Publisher | Cambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1017/s1049096501000749 |
| OpenAlex | W2124616415 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 1 |
| References cited | 2 |
Census 2000 is over; the debate over adjusting the census is not. In this essay I respond to a number of points from Anderson and Fienberg (2001) and report some of the results from Census 2000
American Community Survey · Census · Genealogy · Geography · Population · Regional science · Sociology · Census and Population Estimation · Demography · Global Maternal and Child Health · Health and Conflict Studies · History
| Unique citing works | 1 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,04 |
| Citation span | 2002 - 2002 (1) |
| Citation velocity | historical |
| Highly cited | No |