Federal Policy for the Protection of Human Subjects
Applications to Research on Social Work Practice
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 12385136 |
|---|---|
| Authors | R Kevin Grigsby (Medical College of Georgia, corresponding author), Heidi L Roof (University of Georgia) |
| Year | 1993 |
| Volume | 3 |
| Issue | 4 |
| Pages | 448-461 |
| Publication date | 1993-10-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Research on Social Work Practice (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1049-7315 • E-ISSN: 1552-7581 |
| Publisher | SAGE Publishing (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.1177/104973159300300406 |
| PMID | 11659823 |
| OpenAlex | W2161336684 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 40 |
| References cited | 5 |
Federal policy regarding the protection of human subjects in research has led to the creation of institutional review boards (IRBs) at every institution that receives federal funds for research. The function of the IRB is to review research that involves human subjects to ensure that this research is completed in an ethical manner. Social work research undertaken by researchers at federally funded institutions using human subjects and aiming to build knowledge that is generalizable is subject to IRB review, as is any research that is not specifically exempted from IRB oversight by the law. Social work practitioners and researchers who use research designs to evaluate practice effectiveness should comply with the ethical standards of the profession and may be subject to the standards specified in federal policy The relationships among social work research, the IRB, and the evaluation of social work practice are examined in light of the federal policy for protecting human subjects. Guidelines are given as to the types of research and evaluation that fall under the purview of the IRB
Engineering ethics · Federal law · Human research · Human services · Institutional review board · Legislation · Political science · Public relations · Subject (documents · Work (physics · Counseling Practices and Supervision · Engineering · Ethics in medical practice · Law · Occupational and Professional Licensing Regulation · Psychology · Social Work
NIH policies on experimental studies with humans
Can research ethics committees enable clinical trial data sharing
Big data and Belmont
The Institutional Review Board Problem
Reform within the Common Rule
Rethinking the Importance of the Individual within a Community of Data
Genetic Data Aren't So Special
Beyond the Belmont Principles
The concept of ‘vulnerability’ in research ethics
Managing Danger in Oral Historical Fieldwork
Aoir Ethics Panel 2
Teaching Note—Connections Tutoring Lab
Whose story is it? Mental health consumer and carer views on carer participation in research
Re-evaluating standards of human subjects protection for sensitive health data in social media networks
The ethics and logistics of field-based genetic paternity studies
Why Student Ratings of Faculty Are Unethical
Subjects and Scholars’ Views on the Ethics of Political Science Field Experiments
Ethical Guidelines for Designing and Conducting Evaluations of Social Work Practice
Hitting the moving target
Toward a more public discussion of the ethics of federal social program evaluation
Institutional Review Board Issues Related to Special Populations
Interview and recollection-based research with child disaster survivors
Engaging a state
A Study of Reliance Agreement Templates Used by U.S. Research Institutions
Advance Directives for Research
Patient‐Centered Outcomes Research
Toward a More Comprehensive Approach to Protecting Human Subjects
Implementing Single IRB Review of Multisite Research
Evaluating the Decisional Capacity for Informed Consent of Transition age Children to Adolescents in Human Subject Research
IRB Oversight of Patient-Centered Outcomes Research
Assessing the Quality of Va Human Research Protection Programs
Measuring IRB Regulatory Compliance
Health Research Ethics
Biobanking in the Pediatric Critical Care Setting
Children’s Decision-Making Involvement About Research Participation
Community-Based Participatory Research and the Ethics Review Process
Australian Mental Health Consumer and Carer Perspectives on Ethics in Adult Mental Health Research
Broad Consent for Research on Biospecimens
Ethics Regulation in Social Computing Research
Random Assignment and Informed Consent
| Unique citing works | 40 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 1,43 |
| Citation span | 1998 - 2025 (28) |
| Citation velocity | recent |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 32 |