Barriers to Condom Use and Safer Sex Talk among College Dating Couples
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 12396458 |
|---|---|
| Authors | David W Seal (0000-0002-5802-7148, Center for Clinical Studies, corresponding author), DEBORAH A PALMER-SEAL (University of New Mexico) |
| Year | 1996 |
| Volume | 6 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 15-33 |
| Publication date | 1996-05-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1052-9284 • E-ISSN: 1099-1298 |
| Publisher | Wiley (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1002/(sici)1099-1298(199602)6:1<15::aid-casp352>3.0.co;2-2 |
| OpenAlex | W1978946689 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 13 |
| References cited | 20 |
Using an open-ended questionnaire response format, this study examined self-generated barriers to condom use and safer sex talk among 119 heterosexual college dating couples at the University of New Mexico (total N=238). Data were collected from both members of these dyads. Reasons for abstaining from intercourse were also elicited. Several general response categories emerged including no perceived risk; spontaneity; deliberate choice; negative attitudes; and a lack of perceived self-efficacy for enacting condom use and safer sex discussion. Explanations for abstinence included religious/moral prohibitions; lack of readiness for intercourse; and a fear of being emotionally hurt. Few differences emerged across gender, ethnicity (Caucasian vs Hispanic), and prior sexual experience (participant had intercourse prior to current relationship vs did not). Selected reasons for not using a condom and/or discussing safer sex (e.g. partner is monogamous) were cross-validated with the self-reported behavior of the respondent's dating partner. In general, participants reasons for perceived non-risk were not supported by their partner's reported behavior. Implications of these findings for sexual risk reduction programs include: establishing realistic goals for safer sex behavior and talk within committed relationships, acknowledging the impact of passion on safer sex, and addressing knowledge gaps in risk perception
Abstinence · Condom · Developmental psychology · Ethnic group · Family medicine · Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV · Perception · Psychiatry · Respondent · Risk perception · SAFER · Safer sex · Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health · Medicine · Psychology · Sex work and related issues · Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology · Demography · Social Psychology
Predicting the Condom Assertiveness of Collegiate Females in the United States From the Expanded Health Belief Model
Who Cares What Others Think? the Indirect Effect of Others’ Attitudes on Condom Use Intentions
Barriers and facilitators of HIV prevention with heterosexual Latino couples
Does Efficacy Mediate Stage of Change and Condom Use in Injected-Drug Users
Conocimiento y uso de anticonceptivos entre los jóvenes mexicanos. El papel del género / Contraceptive Knowledge and Use among Young Mexicans
Reactions of Heterosexual African American Men to Women's Condom Negotiation Strategies
University Students’ Definitions of Sexual Abstinence and Having Sex
Gender Matters
An event-level examination of successful condom negotiation strategies among young women
Predictors of Unprotected Sex with Non-cohabitating Primary Partners among Sheltered and Low-income Housed Women in Los Angeles County
Condoms, Sex, and Sexually Transmitted Diseases
Interpartner concordance of self‐reported sexual behavior among college dating couples
HIV-Prevention-Related Sexual Health Promotion for Heterosexual Men in the United States
A Longitudinal Study of Human Immunodeficiency Virus Transmission by Heterosexual Partners
Getting to know you … young people's knowledge of their partners at first intercourse
Changes in condom use among Black, Hispanic, and White heterosexuals in San Francisco
Predictors of condom‐related behaviors among first‐year college students
Social Construction of HIV Transmission and Prevention among Heterosexual Young Adults
| Unique citing works | 13 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,45 |
| Citation span | 1997 - 2019 (23) |
| Citation velocity | historical |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 5 |