Can regenerated inner‐city areas remain sites of public‐place sociability? Psycho‐social processes predicting public sociability in a changing neighbourhood
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 12396552 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Leonor Bettencourt (0000-0003-0882-9078, Instituto Universitário de Lisboa (ISCTE‐IUL) Lisbon Portugal, corresponding author), P Castro (0000-0002-7396-7373, Instituto Universitário de Lisboa (ISCTE‐IUL) Lisbon Portugal), John Dixon (0000-0002-3972-6437, School of Psychology Open University UK) |
| Year | 2020 |
| Volume | 31 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 9-25 |
| Publication date | 2020-08-16 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1052-9284 • E-ISSN: 1099-1298 |
| Publisher | Wiley (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1002/casp.2480 |
| OpenAlex | W3059496562 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 4 |
| References cited | 38 |
The processes of urban regeneration of long‐disinvested inner‐city neighbourhoods today happening in many European cities sometimes dramatically transform residents' traditional uses of their public places. Focusing on a neighbourhood renowned for its traditional public place sociability – Mouraria, in Lisbon – this study explored the psychosocial processes that may shape the maintenance of that sociability in the face of increasing social diversification and small‐scale gentrification brought about by a mixed/bottom‐up regeneration plan. A questionnaire survey ( n = 201) with two types of residents (“traditional residents” and “new gentrifiers”) indicated that: (a) both types report using Mouraria's public places for socializing, although traditional residents do so to a greater degree; (b) perceived cultural continuity of the neighbourhood is positively related to public place sociability for both groups; and (c) this relationship is mediated by both place identification and place knowledge; but (d) it is not moderated by type of resident. By implication, we argue that regenerated inner‐city neighbourhoods may remain as places of lively public sociability and companionship if residents are able to forge and/or retain a sense of identification with, and intimate knowledge of, the neighbourhood, and view it as maintaining continuity with the past
Economic growth · Gentrification · Neighbourhood (mathematics · Place attachment · Psychosocial · Residence · Sense of place · Social science · Sociology · Community Health and Development · Place Attachment and Urban Studies · Psychology · Social Psychology · Urban Green Space and Health
Dislocating identity
Towards an integrative model of place identification
Rethinking Community‐Based Conservation
Intercultural welcoming spaces in Montréal
‘Imagining ourselves’ as participating publics
For better or worse
Place attachment, identification and environment perception
Place attachment, place identity, and place memory
Meanings of Place
Urban governance and regeneration policies in historic city centres
Micropolitics of Public Space
The role of local knowledge in adaptation to climate change
When national culture is disrupted
Culture‐led Urban Regeneration and the Revitalisation of Identities in Newcastle, Gateshead and the North East of England
Reconsidering neoliberal urban planning in times of crisis
Perceived urban quality of the historic centers
Social mix neighbourhood policies and social interaction
Withdrawal from the Local Public Place
Landscape research group
Perceived social diversity and neighbourhood attachment
The power of politics
Re‐identifying residential mixing
Putting identity into the community
Perceived collective continuity
Gentrification and Social Mixing
Culture-led neighbourhood transformations beyond the revitalisation/gentrification dichotomy
Displacement and gentrification in England and Wales
Placemaking in a translocal receiving community
The New Divided City
Superdiversity and conviviality
Integrating superdiversity in urban governance
Place Attachment and Memory
| Unique citing works | 4 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,8 |
| Citation span | 2021 - 2026 (6) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 4 |