Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Public Responses to Community Compensation

The Importance of Prior Consultations with Local Residents

Bibliographic Data

ID12397258
AuthorsBart W Terwel (0000-0001-6253-5906, Department of Social and Organizational Psychology Leiden University the Netherlands, corresponding author), Florentine A Koudenburg (Department of Social and Organizational Psychology Leiden University the Netherlands), Emma Ter Mors (0000-0002-7001-2221, Department of Social and Organizational Psychology Leiden University the Netherlands)
Year2014
Volume24
Issue6
Pages479-490
Publication date2014-01-24
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueJournal of Community & Applied Social Psychology (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1052-9284 • E-ISSN: 1099-1298
PublisherWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1002/casp.2186
OpenAlexW2159781380
LanguageEN
Citations received14
References cited22

A company that wants to implement an industrial project with adverse local impacts can offer the members of the affected community compensation for bearing the burdens associated with the project. In the current study, participants evaluated such a situation from the perspective of observer. Depending on experimental condition, they learned that a company either had or had not consulted members of the affected community prior to deciding on the compensation offer. The compensation offer was either public goods compensation or individual monetary compensation. We hypothesized and found that the decision‐making process was considered fairer and the company was perceived as more concerned with the local public interest when the company had consulted local residents prior to deciding on the compensation offer. Also, the company was believed to be more concerned with the local public interest when it offered public goods compensation instead of individual monetary compensation. Perceived concern and perceived fairness predicted the perceived trustworthiness of the company, and this, in turn, predicted how participants anticipated the members of the affected community to react to the compensation offered by the company. The study thus demonstrates the importance of consultations with local residents in the process of deciding on compensation measures. Copyright © 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd

Business · Compensation (psychology · Financial compensation · Local community · Perspective (graphical · Political science · Process (computing · Public relations · Trustworthiness · Environmental Education and Sustainability · Law · Psychology · Risk Perception and Management · Social Acceptance of Renewable Energy · Social Psychology

  • Funds, fairs, and fire departments

    Open Access•Matilda Kreider, Suzanne Macdonald•Energy Research & Social Science•2026

  • Landscape-based spatial energy planning

    Open Access•Anna Codemo, Michela Ghislanzoni et al.•Journal of Environmental Planning…•2025

  • Stuck on coal and persuasion? A critical review of carbon capture and storage communication

    Open Access•Danny Otto, M Gro•Energy Research & Social Science•2021

  • Aligning Behavioral Assumptions Underlying Policy Instruments

    Open Access•Linsheng He, Yixin Dai et al.•Public Administration•2025

  • Where do you draw the line? Legitimacy and fairness in constructing community benefit fund boundaries for energy infrastructure projects

    Open Access•Patrick Devine‐wright, Fionnguala Sherry‐brennan•Energy Research & Social Science•2019

  • Reimagining benefits from climate infrastructure and investments

    Open Access•Holly Jean Buck, Vanessa Suarez et al.•Energy Research & Social Science•2025

  • The Solution that Might Have Been

    Open Access•Wenche Tobiasson, Tooraj Jamasb•Energy Research & Social Science•2016

  • Community benefits, framing and the social acceptance of offshore wind farms

    Open Access•Benjamin J A Walker, Bouke Wiersma et al.•Energy Research & Social Science•2014

  • Low-carbon but corrupt? Bribery, inappropriateness and unfairness concerns in Danish energy policy

    Open Access•Marie Leer Jørgensen•Energy Research & Social Science•2020

  • Winds of fortune? Understanding the geographic, sociodemographic, and temporal distribution of benefit mechanisms from land-based wind projects in the United States

    Open Access•Matilda Kreider, Candida G Brush et al.•Energy Research & Social Science•2025

  • A fairway to fairness

    Open Access•Michèlle Bal, F Marijn Stok et al.•Energy Research & Social Science•2023

  • Host community compensation in a carbon dioxide capture and storage (CCS) context

    Open Access•Bart W Terwel, Emma Ter Mors•Environmental Science & Policy•2015

  • The role of community benefits in community acceptance of multifunctional solar farms in the Netherlands

    Open Access•Kimo van den Berg, Barbara Tempels•Land Use Policy•2022

  • Grünheide becoming giga? Contesting scale and pace in the establishment of Tesla’s Gigafactory in Germany

    Open Access•Lea Marie Sasse•Geoforum•2026

  • Wind power and community benefits

    Open Access•Mhairi Aitken•Energy Policy•2010

  • What Is a Good Public Participation Process? Five Perspectives from the Public

    Open Access•Rob Krueger, Seth Tuler et al.•Environmental Management•2001

  • Public Participation and Local Environmental Planning

    Yvonne Rydin, Mark Pennington•Local Environment•2000

  • Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis

    Li‐tze Hu, Peter M Bentler•Structural Equation Modeling: A…•1999

  • Acceptance, acceptability and environmental justice

    Richard Cowell, Gabriel Bristow et al.•Journal of Environmental Planning…•2011

  • Understanding public opinion relating to the establishment of community mental health facilities

    Open Access•Sue Cowan, S T Cowan•Journal of Community & Applied…•1999

  • Rethinking Nimbyism

    Open Access•Patrick Devine‐wright•Journal of Community & Applied…•2009

  • Nimby syndrome and public consultation policy

    Open Access•Sue Cowan, S T Cowan•Health & Social Care in the…•2003

  • The Old Lady Visits Your Backyard

    Bruno S Frey, Felix Oberholzer‐Gee et al.•Journal of Political Economy•1996

  • The ‘Social Gap’ in Wind Farm Siting Decisions

    Derek Bell, Tim Gray et al.•Environmental Politics•2005

  • A Ladder Of Citizen Participation

    Sherry R Arnstein•Journal of the American Institute…•1969

Citations per year1.17
Citation span2014 - 2026 (13)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae