A Comparative Study of U.S. and Iranian Counter-Isis Strategies
Datos Bibliográficos
| ID | 12407301 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Dina Esfandiary (King's College London), Ariane M Tabatabai (Georgetown University, autor de correspondencia) |
| Año | 2016 |
| Volumen | 40 |
| Número | 6 |
| Páginas | 455-469 |
| Fecha de publicación | 2016-08-05 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sí |
| Open Access | No |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Revista | Studies in Conflict and Terrorism (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores de la revista | ISSN: 1057-610X • E-ISSN: 1521-0731 |
| Editorial | Taylor & Francis (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/1057610x.2016.1221265 |
| OpenAlex | W2487809321 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citas recibidas | 3 |
The Islamic State in Iraq and Syria (ISIS)'s activities now go beyond insurgency and conventional operations in the territories it controls in the Middle East. It poses a threat to U.S. interests and allies in Europe, and a serious threat to Iran and its borders. While Washington formed an international coalition encompassing many European and Middle Eastern states to combat ISIS, it only coordinates some tactical and operation-level efforts with a key player on the ground: Iran. For its part, Iran is leveraging similar counter-ISIS tools as those adopted by the United States, despite their strategies differing fundamentally
Archaeology · Computer security · Geography · Insurgency · Islam · Key (lock · Middle East · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Sociology · State (computer science · Terrorism · Violent extremism · Computer Science · Law · Terrorism, Counterterrorism, and Political Violence
| Obras citantes distintas | 3 |
|---|---|
| Citas por año | 0,38 |
| Intervalo de citas | 2018 - 2021 (4) |
| Velocidad de citación | historical |
| Altamente citado | No |
| Tipos de cita | Neutras: 3 |