Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

The U.S.–rok Relationship into Full Bloom

From ‘Little Strategic Interest’ to Alliance Partner, 1947–1966”

Bibliographic Data

ID12408867
AuthorsJun Suk Hyun (Independent Scholar [email protected]), William Stueck (University of Georgia, [email protected], corresponding author)
Year2019
Volume26
Issue2
Pages103-140
Publication date2019-05-07
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueJournal of American-East Asian Relations (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1058-3947 • E-ISSN: 1876-5610
PublisherBrill (PUBLISHER • NL)
DOI10.1163/18765610-02602002
OpenAlexW3082254754
LanguageEN
References cited12

U.S. relations with South Korea had a rocky start during U.S. occupation when American planners rated the peninsula low on the list of U.S. strategic priorities. The psychology of the relationship improved in 1948, when the United States helped create the Republic of Korea ( rok ), and even more after June 1950, when U.S. military intervention prevented North Korea from conquering South Korea. With the July 1953 armistice in the Korean War, the United States reluctantly agreed to a bilateral alliance that eventually became the centerpiece of American defense strategy there. With concerns ongoing about Chinese expansion and Japanese reliability, staunchly anti-Communist South Korea became the most reliable U.S. strategic partner in East Asia. When Pak Chŏnghŭi emerged as a strong leader in the mid-1960s, the United States came to see the rok as a valuable strategic asset in countering Asian communism. With South Korea’s settlement with Japan and commitment of combat forces to Vietnam in 1965 and U.S. acceptance of a Status-of-Forces Agreement with the rok a year later, the bilateral alliance relationship reached a peak after two decades of challenges

Alliance · Business · China · Communism · Development economics · East Asia · Economics · Geography · Intervention (counseling · Peninsula · Political science · Politics · Settlement (finance · Asian Culture and Media Studies · Japanese History and Culture · Korean Peninsula Historical and Political Studies · Law · Psychology

  • Two Koreas

    Don Oberdorfer, Robert Carlin•Two Koreas•2013

  • The Evolution of Foreign Policy

    John Foster Dulles•US Nuclear Strategy•1989

  • A Substitute for Victory

    Rosemary Foot•Substitute for Victory•1990

  • The Reluctant Crusade

    James I Matray•Reluctant Crusade•1985

  • Where they were

    Open Access•Robert S Norris, William M Arkin et al.•Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists•2000

  • The American Occupation of Japan

    Michael Schaller•The SHAFR Guide Online•2017

  • China and the Escalation of the Vietnam War

    Mao Lin•Journal of Cold War Studies•2009

  • Security Trumps Ideology

    Inhan Kim•Journal of American-East Asian…•2016

  • An Alliance Forged in Blood’

    William Stueck, Boram Yi•Journal of Strategic Studies•2010

  • The Politics of Development

    Open Access•Mary Brown Bullock•Political Science Quarterly•1990

  • In the Service of Pharaoh? The United States and the Deployment of Korean Troops in Vietnam, 1965-1968

    Nicholas Evan Sarantakes•Pacific Historical Review•1999

  • The Troubled Peace

    Lucian W Pye, Chae-Jin Lee•Foreign Affairs•2006

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae