Trump’s First Year in Asia
Accelerating a Long-term Trend”
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 12409013 |
|---|---|
| Authors | David C Kang (0000-0002-5685-3841, Southern California University for Professional Studies, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2018 |
| Volume | 25 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 198-220 |
| Publication date | 2018-07-04 |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Journal of American-East Asian Relations (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1058-3947 • E-ISSN: 1876-5610 |
| Publisher | Brill (PUBLISHER • NL) |
| DOI | 10.1163/18765610-02502002 |
| OpenAlex | W2859616818 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 4 |
What has been the impact of Donald J. Trump’s presidency on the place of the United States in East Asia? Trump already has shown a proclivity for upending the mainstream American consensus about grand strategy to East Asia, with the real possibility of a trade war with China or a shooting war with North Korea on the horizon. However, this article will place President Trump’s first year in office into a larger context of long-term decline of U.S. leadership and influence in East Asia, arguing that this trend has been underway for quite some time, and that Trump has not altered fundamentally this trajectory. Some of Trump’s actions may accelerate a decline in U.S. leadership, but by no means was Trump the first nor will he be the last U.S. president to deal with a swiftly changing East Asia. The region has been changing rapidly for decades, and there are no indications that this will stop anytime soon. However, continuing and gradual U.S. withdrawal from leadership does not mean less American-East Asia interaction. East Asia will remain the most important trading and investment region for the U.S. for the foreseeable future
China · Context (archaeology · Development economics · East Asia · Economic history · Economics · Global Leadership · Grand strategy · Mainstream · Middle East · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Presidency · Trade war · Economic Sanctions and International Relations · Global Political and Economic Relations · History · International Relations and Foreign Policy · Law
| Highly cited | No |
|---|