Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Reading Failure in(to) Jude the Obscure

Hardy's Sue Bridehead and Lady Jeune's “New Woman” Essays, 1885–1900

Bibliographic Data

ID12411784
AuthorsWilliam A Davis (Notre Dame of Maryland University, corresponding author)
Year1998
Volume26
Issue1
Pages53-70
Publication date1998-01-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueVictorian Literature and Culture (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1060-1503 • E-ISSN: 1470-1553
PublisherCambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1017/s1060150300002278
OpenAlexW2051121598
LanguageEN
References cited8

Thomas hardy was at work on his last novel, Jude the Obscure , when two of the best-known New Woman novels of the 1890s, Sarah Grand's The Heavenly Twins and George Gissing's The Odd Women , appeared in 1893. Hardy read The Heavenly Twins , or at least parts of it, in May 1893 and noted its criticism of the “constant cultivation of the [female] animal instincts” (i.e., the marital and maternal instincts) in his notebook (qtd. in Literary Notebooks 2:57). Hardy met Sarah Grand later in the spring and praised her to his friend Florence Henniker as a writer who had “decided to offend her friends (so she told me) — & now that they are all alienated she can write boldly, & get listened to” ( Collected Letters 2:33). Hardy was also at this time looking into the popular short-story collection Keynotes (1893) by George Egerton (Mary Chavelita Clairmonte), from which he copied a passage concerning man's inability to appreciate “the problems of [woman's] complex nature” (qtd. in Literary Notebooks 2:60). Hardy's interest in George Egerton continued for several years. He wrote to Florence Henniker in January 1894 and reported that he had “found out no more about Mrs. Clairmont [ sic ]”; Sue Bridehead at this same time was still “very nebulous” ( Collected Letters 2:47). Two years later, Hardy had found the author of Keynotes and finished his novel: he wrote to Mrs. Clairmonte in late December 1895, two months after the publication of Jude the Obscure , and commented on their shared interest in the Sue characters “type”: “I have been intending for years to draw Sue, & it is extraordinary that a type of woman, comparatively common & getting commoner, should have escaped fiction so long” ( Collected Letters 2:102). Hardy's comment suggests that Sue's origins were, at least in part, real New Women, and that he had been following the New Woman phenomenon for several years. Hardy had completed work on Jude in the spring of 1895 while simultaneously reading another New Woman novel, the best-selling and controversial The Woman Who Did (1895) by Grant Allen. Hardy wrote to Allen in February 1895 to thank Allen for sending a copy of the novel and to express his praise for the book, which he had read “from cover to cover.” Hardy added that it “was curious to find how exactly [Allen] had anticipated my view” ( Collected Letters 2:68)

Art · Art history · Criticism · George (robot · Instinct · Literature · Reading (process · Theology · Wife · Classics · Contemporary Literature and Criticism · History · Philosophy · Short Stories in Global Literature · Thomas Hardy Literature Studies

  • The Life and Work of Thomas Hardy

    Open Access•Thomas Hardy, Michael Millgate•Life and Work of Thomas Hardy•1984

  • New Women, New Novels

    Susan Fraiman, Ann Ardis et al.•Tulsa Studies in Women s Literature•1993

  • Man and Woman

    Sarah Smith, Sarah W R Smith et al.•Eighteenth-Century Studies•1979

  • Sue Bridehead Revisited

    Anne B Simpson•Victorian Literature and Culture•1991

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae