Moscow elites and the use of coercive foreign policy
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 12412293 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Elena Bashkirova (Bashkirova and Partners Ltd., Moscow, Russia, corresponding author), Tamara Litikova (Bashkirova and Partners Ltd., Moscow, Russia), Dina Smeltz (0000-0003-1958-4977, The Chicago Council on Global Affairs, Chicago, IL, USA) |
| Year | 2019 |
| Volume | 35 |
| Issue | 5-6 |
| Pages | 471-476 |
| Publication date | 2019-10-23 |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Post-Soviet Affairs (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1060-586X • E-ISSN: 1938-2855 |
| Publisher | Taylor & Francis (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/1060586x.2019.1663047 |
| OpenAlex | W2981508854 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 1 |
| References cited | 1 |
The purpose of this paper is to analyze differences between Russian opinion leaders on the basis of Russian elite studies conducted in 2008, 2012 and 2016. We divide elites into two groups – supporters and opponents of official regime foreign policy – based on their attitudes toward the official governmental positions on Russian–US relations and examine their attitudes over the past decade (2008–2016). Analyzing the attitudes of elites who strongly support the official agenda versus those who are more oriented toward the West will help determine whether there has been wholesale elite consolidation around President Putin’s policy agenda or whether any significant scepticism about current Russian foreign policy remains
Consolidation (business · Economics · Elite · Foreign policy · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Skepticism · Sociology · European and Russian Geopolitical Military Strategies · International Relations and Foreign Policy · Law · Accounting
| Citations per year | 0.5 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2024 - 2024 (1) |
| Highly cited | No |