Russian Resilience as a Great Power
A Response to Ambrosio
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 12412349 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Michael Mcfaul (Stanford University), Alexandra Vacroux (b Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars) |
| Year | 2006 |
| Volume | 22 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 24-33 |
| Publication date | 2006-01-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Post-Soviet Affairs (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1060-586X • E-ISSN: 1938-2855 |
| Publisher | Taylor & Francis (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.2747/1060-586x.22.1.24 |
| OpenAlex | W2045832626 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 6 |
Two political scientists comment on Thomas Ambrosio's "The Geopolitics of Demographic Decay: HIV/AIDS and Russia's Great-Power Status" (Post-Soviet Affairs, 22, 1, January-March 2006). Ambrosio's three indicators of great-power capacity—Russia's society, military, and economy—are reviewed in terms of his argument about how the projected effects of HIV/AIDS weakens each factor
Argument (complex analysis · Development economics · Economic system · Economics · Geopolitics · Great power · Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV · Physics · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Power (physics · Psychological resilience · Resilience (materials science · International Development and Aid · Law · Medicine · Peacebuilding and International Security · Political Conflict and Governance · Psychology · Virology
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |