Negotiating the Restoration Of the Iran Nuclear Deal
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 12414133 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Wyn Rees (0000-0001-6746-4684, Dr. Rees is professor of international security at the University of Nottingham United Kingdom. Mr. Salimian Rizi is a PhD candidate in English and American studies at the University of Vienna., corresponding author), Hossein Salimian Rizi (Dr. Rees is professor of international security at the University of Nottingham United Kingdom. Mr. Salimian Rizi is a PhD candidate in English and American studies at the University of Vienna.) |
| Year | 2024 |
| Volume | 31 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 69-81 |
| Publication date | 2024-08-16 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Middle East Policy (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1061-1924 • E-ISSN: 1475-4967 |
| Publisher | Wiley (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1111/mepo.12765 |
| OpenAlex | W4401640855 |
| Language | EN |
There have been protracted negotiations in Vienna to revive the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA), or nuclear deal, that Iran signed in 2015 but was suspended by the withdrawal of the United States four years later. This article argues that two factors account for the failure to renew the JCPOA. One is the 2021 change of presidency in Iran from the reformist Hassan Rouhani to the conservative Ebrahim Raisi. The other is the transformed international environment that provided Iran with opportunities to align with China and Russia. While it suited Iran to continue the nuclear talks to minimize the risk of more punitive actions, Tehran has recalculated its interests and taken a hard line on a potential new deal. The process has grown more complicated with Israel's war in Gaza, the conflict's possible expansion across the region, and the election of a new Iranian president. The analysis concludes that Iran is unlikely to return to the JCPOA
China · Negotiation · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Presidency · Punitive damages · Sociology · Economic Sanctions and International Relations · Law · Middle East and Rwanda Conflicts · Public Administration · Security, Politics, and Digital Transformation
| Highly cited | No |
|---|