Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

C hallenges for D emocratization in C entral A sia

W hat C an the U nited S tates D o

Bibliographic Data

ID12415412
AuthorsPınar İpek (0009-0007-9909-0294, Bilkent University, corresponding author), Pinar Ipek
Year2007
Volume14
Issue1
Pages95-106
Publication date2007-03-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueMiddle East Policy (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1061-1924 • E-ISSN: 1475-4967
PublisherWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1111/j.1475-4967.2007.00287.x
OpenAlexW2036942646
LanguageEN
Citations received4
References cited2

T he agenda of post-communist transformation seemed to have faded away in Central Asian countries until the tragic terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001.In the aftermath of the Iraq War, democratization in "failed" and authoritarian states has rapidly become the focus of U.S. foreign policy.Since the events in Kyrgyzstan, Central Asia has been added to the debate on third-wave democratization that has been witnessed in Georgia and Ukraine.In light of the increasing turbulence in Iraq and the unexpected death of Turkmenistan's President Niyazov, the challenges for democratization in Central Asia should be reevaluated.This article argues that the prospects for democracy in that region are vulnerable to internal and external actors as well as structural problems in the individual states, which possess vast energy resources and crucial routes for exporting them.Thus, to avoid the error of coddling dictators to serve its agenda, the United States should consider developing a longer-term policy that takes into consideration not only the strategic importance of Central Asia, but also the development of its civil society. STRATEGIC CONSIDERATIONSFor much of the 1990s, U.S. economic assistance to the region was delivered under the auspices of the Freedom Support Act, but levels of funding fluctuated. 1 Assistance has increased with the implementation of Operation Enduring Freedom. 2 Transferring nuclear weapons out of Kazakhstan and preventing Iran's involvement in oil and gas projects in the region were the priorities of U.S. foreign policy in the 1990s. 3 The post-September 11 rhetoric of U.S. foreign policy insists that democracy is essential to the undermining of conditions that engender terrorism.However, the strategy of the Bush administration, at least for now, is largely focused on the military aspect of the global war on terrorism.The presence of the U.S. airbase outside the Manas Airport in Bishkek, Kyrgyzstan -despite the removal of

Citation · Democracy · Library science · Political science · Politics · Computer Science · Jewish and Middle Eastern Studies · Law · Political Conflict and Governance · Politics and Conflicts in Afghanistan, Pakistan, and Middle East

  • Outcomes and strategies in the ‘New Great Game

    Open Access•Karen Smith Stegen, Julia Kusznir•Journal of Eurasian Studies•2015

  • Internal and external factors in the democratization of Azerbaijan

    Aytan Gahramanova•Democratization•2009

  • Changing security threat perceptions in Central Asia

    Kirill Nourzhanov•Australian Journal Of International…•2009

  • Azerbaijan's Foreign policy and Challenges for Energy Security

    Pınar İpek, Pinar Ipek•The Middle East Journal•2009

  • The Logic of Collective Action

    Mancur Olson•Logic of Collective Action•1965

  • The United States and central Asia

    Svante E Cornell, Svante Cornell•Cambridge Review of International…•2004

Unique citing works4
Citations per year0,24
Citation span2009 - 2015 (7)
Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 4
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae