In whom can we trust
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 12416618 |
|---|---|
| Authors | John Ziman (corresponding author) |
| Year | 2003 |
| Volume | 11 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 67-76 |
| Publication date | 2003-02-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | European Review (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1062-7987 • E-ISSN: 1474-0575 |
| Publisher | Cambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1017/s1062798703000085 |
| OpenAlex | W1966386478 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 1 |
People need socially accredited but disinterested experts to give them reliable advice about risks. Traditionally, this role has been performed by academics, but academia is coming increasingly under the influence of commercial and political interests. How can ‘post-academic’ science be shaped to sustain its vital role as an independent organ of civil society
Accreditation · Advice (programming · Civil society · Engineering ethics · Political science · Politics · Public relations · Computer Science · Engineering · Evaluation and Performance Assessment · Law · Public Administration · Risk Perception and Management
| Citations per year | 0.06 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2009 - 2009 (1) |
| Highly cited | No |