(Anti)Barbarous Empires
J.M. Coetzee’s Iconoclasm in Waiting for the Barbarians
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 12417217 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Vladimir Biti (0000-0001-8873-0339, University of Vienna, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2023 |
| Volume | 31 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 9-16 |
| Publication date | 2023-01-17 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | European Review (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1062-7987 • E-ISSN: 1474-0575 |
| Publisher | Cambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1017/s1062798722000539 |
| OpenAlex | W4316673511 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 6 |
Empires usually operate on the premise that only imperial centres are carriers of the historical progress of humanity, whereas imperial peripheries are far removed from this progress’s blessing. According to John Maxwell Coetzee, the Dutch Empire considered South Africa as its own land, which deprived that country’s indigenous people of their citizen rights. Like the residents of European imperial peripheries who were relegated to similar zones of historical indistinction, they were doomed to the twilight of legal illegality. Unlike the regulated area of historical progress, their state of exception was ruled by the whims of imperial officials. ‘The security police could come in and out and blindfold and handcuff you without explaining why, and take you away to an unspecified site and do what they wanted to you’, he wrote in Diary of a Bad Year (1977: 171). In his novel Waiting for the Barbarians , Coetzee strategically ‘unmoors’ and ‘deterritorializes’ this peripheral state of exception, spreading its iconoclastic effects all over the ‘sacrosanct’ territory of history
Ancient history · Archaeology · Blessing · Empire · Humanity · Iconoclasm · Indigenous · Political science · Premise · State (computer science · History · Law · Philosophy · South African History and Culture
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |