Historical Periods as Problematics
Socio-linguistic Situations, Sociolects and Discourses
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 12417485 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Peter V Zima (University of Klagenfurt, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2013 |
| Volume | 21 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 292-299 |
| Publication date | 2013-04-30 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | European Review (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1062-7987 • E-ISSN: 1474-0575 |
| Publisher | Cambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1017/s1062798712000440 |
| OpenAlex | W2121939839 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 9 |
The author attempts a redefinition of literary epochs or periods as problematics, i.e. as constellations of problems to which individuals and groups react in many different ways. In this respect he differs from those who construct literary periods as world visions, ideologies, aesthetics or stylistics. He defines problematics from a sociosemiotic point of view: as socio-linguistic situations in which competing collective languages (sociolects) and discourses react critically and polemically to one another
Aesthetics · Construct (python library · Epistemology · Ideology · Linguistics · Political science · Politics · Sociology · Stylistics · Vision · Anthropology · Computer Science · Language, Metaphor, and Cognition · Law · Lexicography and Language Studies · Philosophy · Translation Studies and Practices
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |