Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Controversies in Vaccination

Bibliographic Data

ID12417569
AuthorsRoman Prymula (0000-0003-1567-2259, University Hospital Hradec Králové, corresponding author)
Year2013
Volume21
IssueS1
PagesS56-S61
Publication date2013-07-01
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueEuropean Review (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1062-7987 • E-ISSN: 1474-0575
PublisherCambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1017/s1062798713000227
OpenAlexW2091694243
LanguageEN

Infectious diseases still jeopardize human health and even lives. In spite of the variety of advanced treatment methods, prevention is considered to be the most effective way to fight infections, and vaccination, no doubt, is one of the most effective preventive measures in the history of mankind. The vaccine controversy is based on a dispute over morality, ethics, effectiveness, and/or safety. There is no 100% safe or effective vaccine; however, benefits clearly overweigh risks. Ironically, as the numbers of cases of vaccine-preventable infectious diseases are falling, the controversies relating to vaccine safety are growing. Vaccines are generally victims of their own success. Controversies can afflict the positive acceptance of immunization, decrease the coverage and uptake and finally threaten the health of children and adults

Environmental health · Immunization · Morality · Political science · Vaccination · Hepatitis B Virus Studies · Law · Medicine · Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy · Viral Infections and Outbreaks Research · Immunology

Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-HubOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae