Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

The Rise and Fall of Enforcement Institutions

An Example of Religion and Secularism

Bibliographic Data

ID12417866
AuthorsPavel Ciaian (0000-0003-2405-5850, Joint Research Center, corresponding author), Ján Pokrivčák (Slovak University of Agriculture in Nitra), d’Artis Kancs (0000-0002-8514-725X, Joint Research Center)
Year2012
Volume20
Issue2
Pages233-251
Publication date2012-03-30
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueEuropean Review (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1062-7987 • E-ISSN: 1474-0575
PublisherCambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1017/s1062798711000469
OpenAlexW1530634451
LanguageEN
Citations received1
References cited14

Societies in Western civilisation enforce their rules through formal secular institutions (SES), whereas less developed civilisations often rely on informal, often religious, institutions (RES). The present paper attempts to explain the determinants of societies’ choice between different enforcement systems, and their implications for society development using an example of two different enforcement models: one informal (RES) and one formal (SES). We find that, because the RES is based on beliefs, its efficiency depends heavily on its credibility, making it hardly flexible and highly susceptible to conflicts in dynamic environments. In contrast, because under the SES societal rules are enforced through a formal legal enforcement sector, the SES is more flexible, although also more costly than the RES. The empirical evidence strongly supports our findings that wealthy, dynamic and fast growing economies typically choose the SES for enforcing societal norms and rules

Civilization · Credibility · Economics · Enforcement · Law and economics · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Positive economics · Public economics · Secularism · Sociology · Corruption and Economic Development · Culture, Economy, and Development Studies · Law · Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems

  • Marginalisation of Roma

    Open Access•Pavel Ciaian, d’Artis Kancs•European Review•2018

  • Toward a Comparative Institutional Analysis

    Masahiko Aoki•Toward a Comparative Institutional…•2001

  • Institutional Change and Globalization

    John L Campbell•Institutional Change and…•2004

  • Why not a political Coase theorem? Social conflict, commitment, and politics

    Open Access•Daron Acemoglu•Journal of Comparative Economics•2003

  • Comparing theories of institutional change

    Open Access•Christopher Kingston, Gonzalo Caballero•Journal of Institutional Economics•2009

  • Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance

    Open Access•Douglass C North•Institutions, Institutional…•1990

  • The Next Christendom

    Philip Jenkins•The next Christendom•2002

  • Salvation, Damnation, and Economic Incentives

    Rachel M Mccleary•Journal of Contemporary Religion•2007

  • Islam and the science–religion debates in modern times

    Open Access•Sadik J Al-Azm•European Review•2007

  • Uncertainty, Evolution, and Economic Theory

    Armen A Alchian•Journal of Political Economy•1950

  • The Secular RevolutionPower, Interests, and Conflict in the Secularization of American Public Life

    Christian Smith•The secular revolution•2003

Unique citing works1
Citations per year0,13
Citation span2018 - 2018 (1)
Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 1

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae