Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

The Three R’s as a Framework for Considering the Ethics of Animal Assisted Interventions

Bibliographic Data

ID12418337
AuthorsMartina Simonato (Italian National Reference Centre for Animal Assisted Interventions, Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale delle Venezie Legnaro (PD) Italy, corresponding author), Marta De Santis (0000-0002-0630-6153, Italian National Reference Centre for Animal Assisted Interventions, Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale delle Venezie Legnaro (PD) Italy), Laura Contalbrigo (0000-0003-2221-9970, Italian National Reference Centre for Animal Assisted Interventions, Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale delle Venezie Legnaro (PD) Italy), Barbara de Mori (0000-0001-7397-1797, Department of Comparative Biomedicine and Food Science, University of Padova Legnaro (PD) Italy), Licia Ravarotto (0000-0003-2009-7156, Health Awareness and Communication Department, Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale delle Venezie Legnaro (PD) Italy), Luca Farina (0000-0002-9552-0169, Italian National Reference Centre for Animal Assisted Interventions, Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale delle Venezie Legnaro (PD) Italy)
Year2020
Volume28
Issue4
Pages395-419
Publication date2020-06-30
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueSociety and Animals (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1063-1119 • E-ISSN: 1568-5306
PublisherBrill (PUBLISHER • NL)
DOI10.1163/15685306-00001767
OpenAlexW3039875607
LanguageEN
References cited46

Animal assisted interventions ( AAI ) have seen a significant development in the last fifty years. They are based on human-animal interactions, and some scientific research is beginning to provide evidence for the benefits of these interventions. However, ethical issues, particularly from the animals’ point of view, are yet to be considered properly. This article contextualizes AAI and the ethical issues concerning the animals involved. Then it outlines the potential adaptation of the Three Rs principle (replacement, reduction, refinement) to this field, considering all aspects related to animal behavior, health, and wellbeing. The analysis of the conditions for the application is accompanied by suggestions to guide research and general practice in AAI in favor of animal welfare, including assessment of the environmental conditions and competence of the professionals involved. Finally, a fourth R, Relationship, is proposed as the distinctive R for ethical AAI practice, possibly interpreted as cooperation

Animal testing · Animal welfare · Competence (human resources · Engineering ethics · Psychological intervention · Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies · Engineering · Geographies of human-animal interactions · Human-Animal Interaction Studies · Psychology · Social Psychology

  • Pet ownership and human health

    Open Access•June Mcnicholas, Andrew Gilbey et al.•BMJ•2005

  • Entangled empathy

    Open Access•Lori Gruen•Politics of Species•2013

  • Animal Rights and Feminist Theory

    J Donovan•Signs: Journal of Women in…•1990

  • Frontiers of Justice

    Open Access•Martha C Nussbaum, Martha Nussbaum•Frontiers of Justice•2007

  • Cardiovascular Reactivity and the Presence of Pets, Friends, and Spouses

    Karen Allen•Psychosomatic Medicine•2002

  • Feminism and the Treatment of Animals

    J Donovan•Signs: Journal of Women in…•2006

  • The Efficacy of Dog Assisted Therapy in Detained Drug Users

    Open Access•Laura Contalbrigo, Marta De Santis et al.•International Journal of…•2017

  • How Good? Ethical Criteria for a ‘Good Life’ for Farm Animals

    Open Access•James Yeates, James W Yeates•Journal of Agricultural and…•2017

  • Dog Handlers' and Dogs' Emotional and Cortisol Secretion Responses Associated with Animal-Aassisted Therapy Sessions

    Dorit Karla Haubenhofer, Kirchengast•Society and Animals•2007

  • The Moral Basis of Animal-Assisted Therapy

    Tzachi Zamir•Society and Animals•2006

  • The Practice and Ethics of Animal-Assisted Therapy with Children and Young People

    Nina Evans, C Gray et al.•The British Journal of Social Work•2012

  • Behavioral Responses of Nursing Home Residents to Visits From a Person with a Dog,a Robot Seal or aToy Cat

    Open Access•Karen Thodberg, Lisbeth Uhrskov Sørensen et al.•Anthrozoös•2016

  • In a different voice

    Carol Gilligan, Carol Gilliagan•In a Different Voice•1993

  • Construct Validity of Animal-Assisted Therapy and Activities

    Lori Marino•Anthrozoös•2012

  • Farm Animal-Assisted Intervention for People with Clinical Depression

    Ingeborg Pedersen, Egil W Martinsen et al.•Anthrozoös•2012

  • Comparison of the Effect of Human Interaction, Animal-Assisted Therapy, and Aibo-Assisted Therapy on Long-Term Care Residents with Dementia

    Stephen C Kramer, Erika Friedmann et al.•Anthrozoös•2009

  • Do Animal-Assisted Activities Effectively Treat Depression? A Meta-Analysis

    Megan A Souter, Michelle D Miller et al.•Anthrozoös•2007

  • Ethical Issues in Animal-Assisted Therapy Programs

    Dorothea Iannuzzi, Andrew N Rowan et al.•Anthrozoös•1991

  • Animal-Assisted Therapy

    Janelle Nimer, Brad Lundahl•Anthrozoös•2007

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOI
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae