Animal Welfare Promotion as a Mechanism of Moral Certification
Microhistorical Evidence From 19th Century Switzerland
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 12418362 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Geoffroy Legentilhomme (Department of International History, Graduate Institute of International and Development Studies Geneva Switzerland, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2020 |
| Volume | 30 |
| Issue | 5-6 |
| Pages | 589-605 |
| Publication date | 2020-11-27 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Society and Animals (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1063-1119 • E-ISSN: 1568-5306 |
| Publisher | Brill (PUBLISHER • NL) |
| DOI | 10.1163/15685306-bja10022 |
| OpenAlex | W3107193945 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 8 |
How do nonhuman animal welfare campaigns influence the institutional use of nonhuman animals? This article narrates an episode of nineteenth century history of Geneva, pertaining to the use of nonhuman animals in science, to argue that welfare advocacy is a risky, and indeed sometimes counterproductive, endeavor. In the late nineteenth century, the mainstream Genevan animal welfare group ( SGPA ) refused to condemn vivisection, and decided to side with Moritz Schiff, a controversial physiologist, provided that he later accepted respecting certain welfare standards in his experiments. The SGPA defended Schiff against the charges of the Genevan abolitionists, and thus provided a metaphorical certificate of “humane treatment” to the vivisector. Behind this moral shield, the laboratory could expand its practices, undisturbed by the need to legitimize them. This episode illustrates the phenomenon of “capture” of the welfarist group by the institutions from which animals are supposed to be protected in the first place
Animal welfare · Biology · Certification · Environmental ethics · Epistemology · Mainstream · Mechanism (biology · Phenomenon · Political science · Politics · Promotion (chess · Welfare · Animal and Plant Science Education · Animal testing and alternatives · Geographies of human-animal interactions · Law · Philosophy · Ecology
| Highly cited | No |
|---|