Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Outdoor Cats

Science, Ethics, and Politics

Bibliographic Data

ID12418564
AuthorsWilliam S Lynn (0000-0003-4957-426X, Marsh Institute, Clark University Worster, MA USA, corresponding author), Francisco J Santiago‐Ávila (0000-0003-4233-9128, Project Coyote and The Rewilding Institute Larkspur, CA USA)
Year2022
Volume30
Issue7
Pages798-815
Publication date2022-12-07
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueSociety and Animals (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1063-1119 • E-ISSN: 1568-5306
PublisherBrill (PUBLISHER • NL)
DOI10.1163/15685306-bja10115
OpenAlexW4312050563
LanguageEN
Citations received2
References cited28

The relationship between people, outdoor cats, and wildlife is the subject of fraught debate. Some conservationists claim cats are harbingers of chaos – akin to a zombie apocalypse threatening biodiversity and public health. The empirical evidence and scientific reasoning do not bear this out. Cats may or may not be a problem for biodiversity depending on diverse ecological and social contexts. Indeed, while all animals can be vectors or victims of zoonotic disease, cats are not a significant threat to public health. While most of the debate is focused on dueling claims about the science, that is not the primary source of the dispute. Instead, moral disputes drive the debate, and managing the relationship between people, cats, and wildlife is a wicked problem rooted in differing ethical values and worldviews. While wicked problems have no permanent or technical fix, addressing their ethical aspects is key to unlocking productive policy options

Biodiversity · Biology · CATS · Criminology · Environmental ethics · Political science · Politics · Public health · Sociology · Wildlife · Geographies of human-animal interactions · Human-Animal Interaction Studies · Law · Medicine · Zoonotic diseases and public health · Ecology

  • Contextual Cues Influence Human Perception of Cat Emotion

    Amanda Puitiza, Holly G Molinaro et al.•Anthrozoös•2025

  • To Roam or Stay Home? Understanding "Pet Parenting" Types in Relation to the Indoor/Outdoor Cat Debate

    Open Access•Kristine Hill•Anthrozoös•2024

  • The biomass distribution on Earth

    Open Access•Yinon M Bar-On, Rob Phillips et al.•Proceedings of the National…•2018

  • Don't judge species on their origins

    Open Access•Mark A Davis, Matthew K Chew et al.•Nature•2011

  • The art of case study research

    Robert E Stake•The art of case study research•1995

  • Reframing Public Policy

    Frank Fischer•Reframing public policy•2003

  • Social Science As Moral Inquiry

    Robert Ν Bellah, Norma Haan et al.•Social Science As Moral Inquiry•1983

  • Ethics, The Social Sciences, and Policy Analysis

    Open Access•Sidney Callahan, Daniel Callahan et al.•Ethics, the Social Sciences, and…•1983

  • Animal Liberation

    Peter Singer•Animal Rights•1973

  • Folk Devils and Moral Panics

    Stanley Cohen, Victoria de los Ángeles Boschiroli•Folk devils and moral panics•2011

  • Bringing Ethics to Wild Lives

    William S Lynn•Society and Animals•2018

  • Contested Moralities

    William S Lynn•Ethics Place & Environment•1998

  • Conducting Interpretive Policy Analysis

    Dvora Yanow•Conducting Interpretive Policy…•2000

Unique citing works2
Citations per year1
Citation span2024 - 2025 (2)
Citation velocityrecent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 2

Tools

Open DOI
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae