Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Does the End Justify the Means? A Media Analysis of Invasive Pig and Fox Management

Bibliographic Data

ID12418910
AuthorsBeatrice Emma Thompson (School of Social Sciences, University of New South Wales Sydney Australia, corresponding author), Melanie Elyse Grace (School of Social Sciences, University of New South Wales Sydney Australia), Bridget Clare Foster (School of Social Sciences, University of New South Wales Sydney Australia), Claire Louise Harrison (School of Social Sciences, University of New South Wales Sydney Australia), Sonia Graham (0000-0003-4195-4559, School of Social Sciences, University of New South Wales Sydney Australia)
Year2018
Volume28
Issue7
Pages776-796
Publication date2018-12-27
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueSociety and Animals (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1063-1119 • E-ISSN: 1568-5306
PublisherBrill (PUBLISHER • NL)
DOI10.1163/15685306-12341593
OpenAlexW2921278751
LanguageEN
References cited18

Growing numbers of researchers and animal rights advocates are concerned about the welfare of invasive nonhuman animals, and new government policies echo these concerns. Past survey research, however, shows that the general public defines invasive animal welfare differently than scientists and animal rights advocates. There is little social research that investigates how differing views on the acceptability of invasive animal controls are reconciled in public fora. This article examines how invasive animal control is represented in two newspapers— The Sydney Morning Herald and The Land —in New South Wales, Australia, focusing on the management of invasive foxes and pigs. The findings revealed that efficacy is emphasized more than humaneness, especially among farmers and peri-urban residents, suggesting a disjuncture between new policies and landholders’ values. Views of indigenous land managers and amenity migrants are rarely represented yet they need to be actively engaged to ensure effective policy change

Amenity · Animal rights · Animal welfare · Biology · Environmental ethics · Government (linguistics · Indigenous · Political science · Public policy · Public relations · Welfare · Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies · Geographies of human-animal interactions · Human-Animal Interaction Studies · Law · Ecology

  • Post-invasion demography of prehistoric humans in South America

    Open Access•Amy Goldberg, Alexis M Mychajliw et al.•Nature•2016

  • ‘A grim health future’

    D Lupton•Health Risk & Society•2004

  • Wildlife and world views

    Heather J Aslin, David Bennett et al.•Human Dimensions of Wildlife•2000

  • Important Cows and Possum Pests

    Jan Dutkiewicz•Society and Animals•2015

  • Framing Cruelty

    Lyle Munro•Society and Animals•1997

  • A Linguistic Analysis of Discourse on the Killing of Nonhuman Animals

    Jill Jepson•Society and Animals•2008

  • Support Your Local Invasive Species”

    Mona Seymour•Society and Animals•2012

  • Camel country

    Open Access•Leah Gibbs, Jennifer M Atchison et al.•Geoforum•2014

  • Animals, Equality and Democracy

    Open Access•Simon O’sullivan, Siobhan O’sullivan et al.•Animals, Equality and Democracy•2011

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOI
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae