Numb Networks

In this response to “Whitman’s Sympathies” by Jane Bennett, I show how Whitman broke with Romantic poetic convention by representing sympathy as an involuntary, embodied affect—as, in Bennett’s terms, “(onto)Sympathy.” However, as I argue, the ontology of Whitmanian sympathy undermines the notion of individual identity—of autonomy, singularity, and difference—upon which sympathy’s traditionally inclusive, pluralist politics depends. Instead of persons and interpersonal ethical relations, Whitmanian sympathy conjures a networked and processual ontology in which discrete entities cannot finally be distinguished. Thus, I argue that Bennett’s notion of “(onto)Sympathy” is incommensurable with the syntax of individual identity and (race, sex, gender, class, species) difference. But even if this makes it incompatible with a politics of recognition, I argue that this networked ontology may nevertheless be strategically better adapted to address the political challenges of ecological crisis

Agency (philosophy · Autonomy · Epistemology · Ontology · Political science · Politics · Sociology · Sympathy · Law · Philosophy · Posthumanist Ethics and Activism · Psychology · Social Psychology

• The Prose Works of William Wordsworth

  Frances Ferguson, W J B Owen et al.•Modern Language Notes•1974

  Add to list

• Whitman’s Sympathies

  Open Access•Jane Bennett•Political Research Quarterly•2016

  Add to list

• Politics of Nature

  Bruno Latour, Caitlin Porter et al.•Politics of Nature•2004

  Add to list