Explaining State Variation in Interparty Ideological Differences
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 12419966 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Joel Paddock (0000-0001-7752-7271, corresponding author) |
| Year | 1998 |
| Volume | 51 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 765-765 |
| Publication date | 1998-09-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Political Research Quarterly (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1065-9129 • E-ISSN: 1938-274X |
| Publisher | SAGE Publishing (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.2307/3088048 |
| OpenAlex | W4230379981 |
| Language | EN |
This article uses two measures of state party ideology-a 1994 survey of state party committee members and a content analysis of state party platforms between 1990 and 1996-to determine variation between states in interparty ideological differences. These interparty ideological differences are compared to David Mayhew's scale measuring the historical presence of traditional party organizations in the American states. As hypothesized, there is a strong tendency for states with histories of traditional party organization to have less ideologically polarized parties than those states without such traditions. This association holds up when we control for state-level measures of education, income, mass polarization, electoral competition, and party control. State environments that historically encouraged or discouraged the formation of traditional party organizations help explain variation in patterns of party activism in the contemporary era
Astronomy · Ideology · Physics · Political science · Politics · State (computer science · Variation (astronomy · Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection · Law · Mathematics · Opinion Dynamics and Social Influence · Rhetoric and Communication Studies
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |