States of Nature in Immanuel Kant’s Doctrine of Right

Bibliographic Data

ID12420050
AuthorsAlan J Kellner (0000-0003-3512-7266, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL, USA, corresponding author)
Year2019
Volume73
Issue3
Pages727-739
Publication date2019-06-14
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenuePolitical Research Quarterly (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1065-9129 • E-ISSN: 1938-274X
PublisherSAGE Publishing (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.1177/1065912919855437
OpenAlexW2952111416
LanguageEN
References cited25

From an analysis of Kant’s states of nature in each division of the Doctrine of Right—the state of nature in general and the international state of nature—this paper reinterprets Cosmopolitan Right and the duty to exit the state of nature as more colonial than previously recognized. Kant places “savages” in the state of nature, depicting them and their lawless condition as bellicose. As such, states may force them to exit the state of nature; those who encounter hostile peoples on foreign lands may be justified in aggressing. Having shown that colonial features of the Doctrine of Right cannot be wrested from the text, this paper unsettles the interpretive dominance of the established view that Kant is staunchly anti-colonial. Nevertheless, anti-colonial features of the text remain. The paper shows that interpreters must accept that Kant’s text is both colonial and anti-colonial. Kant’s global vision remained too statist to appropriately include indigenous politics. The paper closes by briefly indicating a path for future research whereby contemporary Kantian cosmopolitan projects become more attuned to—and modified in light of—the political agency and particular struggles of indigenous peoples

Colonialism · Doctrine · Epistemology · Indigenous · Political science · Politics · State (computer science · American Constitutional Law and Politics · Law · Mathematics · Philosophical Ethics and Theory · Philosophy · Political Philosophy and Ethics

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub