Under pressure
How widespread vs severe competitor unethical practices shape responsible artificial intelligence deployment
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 12420527 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Samuel N Kirshner (0000-0002-2604-2001, UNSW Sydney, corresponding author), Jessica Lawson (0009-0004-9070-5633, UNSW Sydney) |
| Year | 2026 |
| Pages | 1-20 |
| Publication date | 2026-01-13 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Internet Research (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1066-2243 • E-ISSN: 2054-5657 |
| Publisher | Emerald Publishing Limited (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1108/intr-01-2025-0114 |
| OpenAlex | W7123342704 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 51 |
Purpose This study explores how competitive pressure and organizational goals influence responsible AI (RAI) decisions when introducing AI-based digital services. We examine how two types of unethical competition, horizontal (numerous competitors using similar unethical AI tactics) and vertical (a competitor using highly unethical AI), interact with regulatory-focus-driven objectives to shape RAI deployment. Design/methodology/approach We design three experimental studies featuring scenarios involving the launch of an unethical AI service to assess how competitive pressures and organizational goals affect RAI decisions. Each experiment manipulates horizontal and vertical unethical competition. Participants’ regulatory focus is measured in Study 1 (N = 249) and is manipulated through organizational goals in Study 2 (N = 304) to assess their interactions with competitive pressure. Study 3 (N = 159) tests moral disengagement theory as the underlying mechanisms. Findings The results show that horizontal unethical competition increases the launch of unethical AI, regardless of regulatory focus. We uncover a novel interaction effect between vertical unethical competition and firm objectives. While the severity of a competitor’s unethical behavior reduces RAI deployment directly, prevention-focused goals can counteract this effect under vertical unethical competition, promoting more responsible decisions. Originality/value This research advances RAI scholarship by introducing two unethical competitive contexts to analyze how competitive pressure and organizational goals shape decisions to launch unethical AI services. By isolating horizontal and vertical competition, we provide new insights into how external competition drives UPB. The findings provide a behavioral framework for understanding ethical trade-offs in AI deployment, linking high-level ethics to practical governance in competitive settings
Business ethics · Competition (biology · Competitor analysis · Disengagement theory · Horizontal and vertical · Scholarship · Service (business · Software deployment · AI in Service Interactions · Ethics and Social Impacts of AI · Ethics in Business and Education
Thinking responsibly about responsible AI and ‘the dark side’ of AI
Relaxing moral reasoning to win
Moral Disengagement in Processes of Organizational Corruption
Why Employees Do Bad Things
What do we want from Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)? – A stakeholder perspective on XAI and a conceptual model guiding interdisciplinary XAI research
Managing Artificial Intelligence
Principles alone cannot guarantee ethical AI
Consumers and Artificial Intelligence
Exploring Social Desirability Bias
Moral Disengagement at Work
Algorithmic bias
The slippery slope
How Self‐Regulation Creates Distinct Values
Promotion and Prevention
Toward the development of a multidimensional scale for improving evaluations of Business Ethics
Regulatory Focus and Strategic Inclinations
Social cognitive theory of self-regulation
The global landscape of AI ethics guidelines
“It wouldn't happen to me”
Regulatory focus and work-related outcomes
A Tutorial on Testing, Visualizing, and Probing an Interaction Involving a Multicategorical Variable in Linear Regression Analysis
From What to How
Artificial intelligence and robots in individuals' lives
AI governance
Norms or fun? The influence of ethical concerns and perceived enjoyment on the regulation of deepfake information
Effect of the fit between situational regulatory focus and feedback focus on customers' co-design behavior
Loneliness, regulatory focus, inter-personal competence, and online game addiction
The privacy dyad
A mixed-methods investigation of the factors affecting the use of facial recognition as a threatening AI application
Motivation by positive or negative role models
Regulatory fit intensifies moral predispositions
Transfer of value from fit
| Highly cited | No |
|---|