Determinants of cyberloafing
A comparative study of a public and private sector organization
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 12420626 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Zill-e- Huma (0000-0002-2681-1771), Zille Huma (0000-0001-5291-9228, COMSATS University Islamabad, corresponding author), Saddam Hussain (0000-0001-5370-3912, COMSATS University Islamabad), Ramayah Thurasamy (0000-0002-7580-7058, University of Technology Malaysia), Muhammad Imran Malik (0000-0002-5938-8797, COMSATS University Islamabad) |
| Year | 2017 |
| Volume | 27 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 97-117 |
| Publication date | 2017-01-11 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Internet Research (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1066-2243 • E-ISSN: 2054-5657 |
| Publisher | Emerald Publishing Limited (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1108/intr-12-2014-0317 |
| OpenAlex | W2573733315 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 29 |
| References cited | 60 |
Purpose Cyberloafing is the personal use of internet while at work. The purpose of this paper is to identify the factors affecting cyberloafing between public and private sector organizations. Design/methodology/approach This study uses the multiple motivational factors with the help of a theoretical paradigm, renowned as theory of interpersonal behavior (TIB). Data were collected through questionnaire to investigate the different behavioral factors between the public and private sector organizations. PLS path modeling and PLS-MGA are used to access the results on SMARTPLS 2.0 software. Findings Results show that the three factors of habit, intention, and social influences taken from the TIB model are important and have a higher path coefficient in a public sector organization setting. The factors of affect, facilitating condition and perceived consequences from TIB are greater in a private sector organization and have a higher path coefficient. By contrast, in multiple group analysis, results show that some factors are more predictive of cyberloafing behavior in a public sector organization, whereas other factors are more predictive for a private sector organization. Practical implications The findings of the current research are beneficial for both organizations and contribute toward policy-making decisions. These results help the managers of public and private sector organizations to decide how to control cyberloafing behavior by focusing on the important factors that lead to it. Originality/value This study shows strong and significant differences between the two types of organizations in terms of path coefficient. This implies that cyberloafing factors have different impacts on different organizations. The study fills an important gap in comparing public and private sector organizations with respect to cyberloafing behavior and clarifying which factors are more effective in predicting cyberloafing behavior according to type of organization. The paper is of great value for both kinds of organizations that face cyberloafing behavior issues
Business · Economics · Interpersonal communication · Interpersonal influence · Originality · Political science · Private sector · Public relations · Public sector · Cyberloafing and Workplace Behavior · Digital Economy and Work Transformation · Psychology · Social Psychology · Taxation and Compliance Studies · Marketing
La restricción y el aislamiento mostrados a través de imágenes publicadas en Twitter
Cyberloafing
Scrolling on the Clock
A commentary on Lim and Teo's (2022) review of cyberloafing
Exploring the Complex Relationships Between Factors That Affect Employee Cyberloafing Using a Novel Approach
The curvilinear relationship between workload and cyberloafing of employees
Cyberloafing behaviors among university students
The effect of social media use on job performance with moderating effects of Cyberloafing and job complexity
Understanding the influence of problematic smartphone use on work productivity in the post-Covid-19 pandemic
When Fairness Falls Short
When Too Little or Too Much Hurts
Minor and serious cyberloafing in the workplace
Millennial’s perception on cyberloafing
What leads to cyberloafing
Failure of neutralization
The role of abusive supervision and organizational commitment on employees' information security policy noncompliance intention
Enterprise social media usage and social cyberloafing
Examining the side effects of organizational Internet monitoring on employees
Workplace internet leisure and employees’ productivity
Cyberloafing and cyberslacking in the workplace
Are overqualified employees bad apples? A dual-pathway model of cyberloafing
The grey areas of Internet use
How and When Does Cyberloafing Facilitate Creative Performance? Understanding the Role of Browsing‐Related Cyberloafing, Knowledge Acquisition, and Job Demands
Exploring the link between cyberloafing and work-related factors
A test for multigroup comparison using partial least squares path modeling
Methodological research on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM)
Workplace ostracism and cyberloafing
Decision quality and satisfaction
The ethics of digital communication in hybrid societies
Extending the Theory of Planned Behavior
Reflections on Past Behavior
Cyberloafing at the workplace
Internet of Things in Industries
An empirical comparison of the efficacy of covariance-based and variance-based SEM
Correlates of different forms of cyberloafing
Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error
The Internet of Things
Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error
Cyberslacking, Business Ethics and Managerial Economics
Potential determinants of heavier internet usage
Predictors of Use of Social Network Sites at Work - A Specific Type of Cyberloafing
Do current anti‐cyberloafing disciplinary practices have a replica in research findings
Personality predictors for the use of multiple internet functions
Internet addiction among young people in China
The theory of planned behavior and Internet purchasing
Cyberslacking and the Procrastination Superhighway
The IT way of loafing on the job
| Unique citing works | 29 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 3,22 |
| Citation span | 2017 - 2026 (10) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 27 |