The spillover effects of different monetary incentive levels on health experts' free knowledge contribution behavior
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 12420722 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Tuotuo Qi (0000-0002-2488-8222, Central University of Finance and Economics, corresponding author), Tianmei Wang (0000-0002-1019-2339, Central University of Finance and Economics), Jiarui Yan (0009-0007-8084-8827, University of Washington) |
| Year | 2021 |
| Volume | 31 |
| Issue | 6 |
| Pages | 2143-2166 |
| Publication date | 2021-07-15 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Internet Research (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1066-2243 • E-ISSN: 2054-5657 |
| Publisher | Emerald Publishing Limited (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1108/intr-08-2020-0445 |
| OpenAlex | W3184860047 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 8 |
| References cited | 45 |
Purpose Understanding health experts' online free knowledge contribution behavior is vital for promoting health knowledge and improving health literacy. This study focuses on the spillover effects of different monetary incentive levels on health experts' free knowledge contribution behavior. Design/methodology/approach In 2016, Zhihu Live and Zhi Hu were launched as two types of paid knowledge products on Zhihu.com, a hybrid knowledge exchange platform. Focusing on the policy impact of launching Zhihu Live and Zhi Hu , this study uses the difference-in-differences model to analyze the heterogeneous spillover effects of high-yield and low-yield monetary incentives on health experts' free knowledge contribution behavior. Findings In the short term, the high-yield monetary incentive has positive spillover effects on the quantity and quality of free knowledge contribution while the low-yield monetary incentive generates opposite effects. In the long term, the effects of the high-yield monetary incentive remain significantly positive. The effect of the low-yield monetary incentive on the quantity of free knowledge contribution remains significantly negative, but its effect on the quality of free knowledge contribution is not significant. Originality/value This study combines theories of reciprocity and resource limitation to study the spillover effects of different monetary incentive levels on health experts' online behavior. The short-term and long-term effects of different monetary incentive levels on health experts' online behavior are also explored
Business · Economics · Incentive · Knowledge spillover · Microeconomics · Public economics · Spillover effect · Yield (engineering · Digital Marketing and Social Media · FinTech, Crowdfunding, Digital Finance · Knowledge Management and Sharing
Setting goal difficulty in monetary incentives to physicians
Key traits of top answerers on Korean Social Q&A platforms
Identification and Evolutionary Analysis of User Collusion Behavior in Blockchain Online Social Media
Monetary rewards or comment recognition? The difference between the two types of feedback in online Q&A community
Why are physicians willing to contribute knowledge? Evidence from online health communities
Migrants’ knowledge sharing in ethnic mobile communities
Stimulating positive reviews by combining financial and compassionate incentives
Archetypes of influential users in social question-answering sites
Gratitude and Prosocial Behavior
Incentives and Prosocial Behavior
What's Mine Is Ours, or Is It? A Study of Attitudes about Information Sharing
Pay Enough or Don't Pay at All
Motivation Crowding Theory
Behavioral Intention Formation in Knowledge Sharing
Knowledge sharing motivations in online health communities
How Doctors Gain Social and Economic Returns in Online Health-Care Communities
Effort for Payment
Exploring characteristics and effects of user participation in online social Q&A sites
Why people share knowledge in virtual communities
The Norm of Reciprocity
What Policies Increase Prosocial Behavior? An Experiment with Referees at the Journal of Public Economics
| Citations per year | 4 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2024 - 2026 (3) |
| Highly cited | No |