Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Working too much in China's tech industry

Corporate social advocacy as a crisis response strategy to issue-based opinion polarization

Bibliographic Data

ID12420975
AuthorsYingru Ji (0000-0003-2969-2947, Zhejiang University, corresponding author), Chang Wan (0000-0002-8841-7403, Zhejiang University)
Year2023
Volume34
Issue2
Pages320-342
Publication date2023-01-16
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueInternet Research (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1066-2243 • E-ISSN: 2054-5657
PublisherEmerald Publishing Limited (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1108/intr-12-2021-0878
OpenAlexW4316369050
LanguageEN
Citations received1
References cited58

Purpose Once a corporate crisis is entangled with a social issue, how consumers make sense of the crisis can be impacted by issue-based opinion polarization. This study investigates the underlying mechanisms as consumers go through this process. This study also examines whether corporate social advocacy (CSA) can be an effective crisis-response strategy for mitigating reputational loss. Design/methodology/approach Theoretical inquiries were empirically tested using an online experiment ( N = 792). The experiment set the context in China, in a working-overtime-issue-related crisis. It had a 2 (online exposure: anti-issue opinion vs. pro-issue opinion) × 2 (CSA: absence vs. presence) between-subject design with a continuous variable (pre-existing issue attitudes) measured before the manipulation. Findings This study found that pre-existing issue attitudes can be directly and indirectly associated with corporate reputation, for the issue attitudes influence how consumers attribute crisis blame. Such a direct effect of pre-existing issue attitudes varies depending on which polarized opinion consumers were exposed to on social media. This study also found CSA to be a robust crisis response strategy, through multiple mechanisms, in protecting the corporate reputation. Originality/value Scholars are scarcely aware of the threats that issue-based opinion polarization poses to corporate reputation. This study serves as an early attempt to provide theoretical explanations. In addition to this, this study extends the current conceptual understandings of CSA during corporate crises that involve social issues while adding fresh insights into the established typology of crisis-response strategies

Blame · Business · Corporate communication · Corporate social responsibility · Crisis communication · Crisis response · Originality · Polarization (electrochemistry · Political science · Public relations · Reputation · Social media · Law · Nonprofit Sector and Volunteering · Psychology · Public Relations and Crisis Communication · Social Media and Politics · Social Psychology

  • Voices in the digital storm

    Open Access•Yunfei Xing, John Zaixin Zhang et al.•Technology in Society•2024

  • Issue Publics in the New Information Environment

    Open Access•Young Mie Kim, Young Mie Kim Young Mie Kim•Communication Research•2009

  • Understanding online firestorms

    Jürgen Pfeffer, Thomas Zorbach et al.•Journal of Marketing Communications•2014

  • Compliance with a Request in Two Cultures

    Open Access•Robert B Cialdini, Wilhelmina Wosinska et al.•Personality and Social Psychology…•1999

  • Communication and Attributions in a Crisis

    W Timothy Coombs, Sherry J Holladay•Journal of Public Relations…•1996

  • The Reputation QuotientSM

    Open Access•Charles J Fombrun, Naomi A Gardberg et al.•Journal of Brand Management•2000

  • Protecting Organization Reputations During a Crisis

    Open Access•W Timothy Coombs•Corporate Reputation Review•2007

  • The Company and the Product

    Open Access•Thomas J Brown, Tom J Brown et al.•Journal of Marketing•1997

  • The Analysis of Mechanisms and Their Contingencies

    Open Access•Andrew F Hayes, Amanda Kay Montoya et al.•Australasian Marketing Journal•2017

  • An attributional theory of achievement motivation and emotion.

    Bernard Weiner•Psychological Review•1985

  • Exposure to opposing views on social media can increase political polarization

    Open Access•Christopher A Bail, Chris Bail et al.•Proceedings of the National…•2018

  • Nonprofit Organizations and Political Advocacy

    J Craig Jenkins•Nonprofit Sector•2017

  • Does negatively toned language use on social media lead to attitude polarization

    Open Access•Jürgen Buder, Lisa Rabl et al.•Computers in Human Behavior•2021

  • Social Media, Network Heterogeneity, and Opinion Polarization

    Open Access•Jae Kook Lee, Jihyang Choi et al.•Journal of Communication•2014

  • The Spiral of Silence a Theory of Public Opinion

    Open Access•Elisabeth Noelle-Neumann•Journal of Communication•1974

  • The Elaboration Likelihood Model of Persuasion

    Richard E Petty, John T Cacioppo•Communication and Persuasion•1986

  • The Impact of Neoliberalism on Civil Society and Nonprofit Advocacy

    Open Access•J Alexander, Kandyce Fernandez•Nonprofit Policy Forum•2020

  • Correlates of Party, Ideology and Issue Based Extremity in an era of Egocentric Publics

    Open Access•Magdalena Wojcieszak, Hernando Rojas•The International Journal of…•2011

  • Fake, Faulty, and Authentic Stand-Taking

    Myungok Chris Yim•International Journal of…•2021

  • The digital outcry

    Open Access•Marius Johnen, Marc Jungblut et al.•New Media & Society•2017

  • Fighting biased news diets

    Open Access•T G L A Van Der Meer, Michael Hameleers•New Media & Society•2020

  • Crisis-induced public demand for regulatory intervention in the social media era

    Open Access•Yingru Ji, Sora Kim•New Media & Society•2019

  • Monitoring the Opinion of the Crowd

    German Neubaum, Nicole C Krämer•Media Psychology•2016

  • News Images, Race, and Attribution in the Wake of Hurricane Katrina

    Open Access•Eran N Ben‐porath, Eran N Ben-Porath et al.•Journal of Communication•2010

  • Thinking Fast and Furious

    Open Access•David Asker, Elias Dinas•Public Opinion Quarterly•2019

  • Ideology, Attitude Change, and Deliberation in Small Face-to-Face Groups

    John Gastil, Laura W Black et al.•Political Communication•2008

  • Motivated Skepticism in the Evaluation of Political Beliefs

    Open Access•Charles S Taber, Milton Lodge•American Journal of Political…•2006

  • Corporate Social Advocacy as Public Interest Communications

    Open Access•Lucinda Austin, Barbara Miller Gaither et al.•The Journal of Public Interest…•2019

  • Framing

    Open Access•Robert M Entman•Journal of Communication•1993

  • Have American's Social Attitudes Become More Polarized

    P Dimaggio, J H Evans et al.•American Journal of Sociology•1996

Citations per year0.5
Citation span2024 - 2024 (1)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOI
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae