Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

The Quad, Aukus and Australian Security Minilateralism

China’s Rise and New Approaches to Security Cooperation

Bibliographic Data

ID12422012
AuthorsNick Bisley (0000-0001-6216-3575, La Trobe University, corresponding author)
Year2024
Volume34
Issue154
Pages564-576
Publication date2024-06-11
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueJournal of Contemporary China (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1067-0564 • E-ISSN: 1469-9400
PublisherRoutledge (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/10670564.2024.2365241
OpenAlexW4399532976
LanguageEN
Citations received14

Since 2017 Australia has adopted a gloomy outlook about Asia's security environment and now sees the PRC as a source of insecurity. A key component of its response to this has been the turn to 'minilaterals'. This article examines Australia's approach to the Quad and AUKUS and explains why Canberra has turned to these minilaterals and what this tells us about the nature of security cooperation in an Asia marked by growing geopolitical contestation and webs of economic interdependence. The first part provides an overview of the policy context in which the move to minilateralism occurred and describes AUKUS and the Quad as distinctive type security collaboration. The second part assesses whether the move is an example of 'hard balancing' as realist scholarship would anticipate or an example of 'institutional balancing'. Neither is entirely convincing. The third part makes the case that the experiments in minilateralism represent new ways of doing security cooperation in an international environment of heightened geopolitical competition, dense networks of economic interdependence and complex domestic imperatives. This has led to the creation of mechanisms that attempt to increase traditional security capabilities, provide international public goods and to develop what I describe as 'security infrastructure

Archaeology · Business · China · Computer security · Geography · Political science · Computer Science · International Relations and Foreign Policy

  • Platformization Without High Commitment

    Open Access•Xingchuan Jiang•Pacific Focus•2026

  • Australia’s Strategic Institutional Innovation in the Indo–Pacific

    Open Access•Rebecca Strating, Sungyong Lee•Asian Studies Review•2026

  • Middle powers’ grand strategy in a great power competition

    Open Access•Edoardo Lavezzo•Australian Journal Of International…•2026

  • Coopetition framework

    Brian C H Fong•The Pacific Review•2026

  • Australia and its China agenda

    Open Access•Elena Collinson•The Pacific Review•2026

  • Emerging Minilateralism in Japan’s Foreign and Security Policy

    Open Access•Sarita Yadav, Nishtha Kaushiki et al.•East Asia•2026

  • Aukus

    Open Access•Lloyd Cox•Asia & the Pacific Policy Studies•2025

  • Minilateralism and the new Indo-Pacific order

    Jagannath Panda, Daewon Ohn•Australian Journal Of International…•2024

  • The Quad as catalyst

    Brendon J Cannon•Australian Journal Of International…•2025

  • Building a new strategic partnership

    Alice Dell''Era•The Pacific Review•2025

  • Minilateralism

    Ryosuke Hanada•The Pacific Review•2025

  • Energy Minilateralism in a Contested Northeast Asia

    Open Access•Martin Zubko•East Asia•2025

  • Minilateralism and Trilateral Cooperation in Northeast Asia

    Daewon Ohn, Er-Win Tan et al.•Asian Studies Review•2026

  • Is it good or is it bad?’

    Open Access•Sebastian Biba•The Pacific Review•2026

Unique citing works14
Citations per year7
Citation span2024 - 2026 (3)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 12

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae