China's brain drain problem

The brain drain has become a growing problem for China's overseas education, especially after the Tiananmen Incident of June 1989. Brain drain is a symptom of a home country's social, economic, or political problems. In China, political alienation, low income, poor living conditions, insufficient research facilities, and mismanagement of high‐level manpower are the major factors pushing intellectuals to seek development opportunities abroad. Beijing has found it difficult to bring students back home. Restrictions often anger students abroad. Family members also discourage students from returning. Many students find it difficult to adjust to the home environment after years living abroad; some are afraid that they will be punished at home for their outspoken political opinions abroad. However, Beijing has limited control over students overseas. Also, after the 1989 June crackdown, most host governments have decided to allow Chinese students to stay. Concerned with the brain drain problem, Beijing is adjusting its policy of study abroad. There are various policy scenarios. Each has its merits and limitations, and each will lead to different consequences. Some technical solutions are also worth considering. Although a brain drain will still occur in the future, the tendency can be reduced if appropriate measures are adopted. China's future policy on overseas education depends on the future domestic situation and foreign relations. Apparently, a continued open policy of overseas education is in the interest of the students and the country. For an effective and long‐term policy, some strategic adjustments are necessary. Beijing needs to shift its attention away from the symptoms and concentrate on to the causes of the brain drain. Also, Beijing needs to redesign its future strategy to balance the benefits and costs of overseas education, instead of attempting to eliminate the brain drain. The brain drain is not permanent. More professionals will return home as the economic and political situation significantly improves. The experience of Taiwan and South Korea in coping with their brain drain problem is a valuable reference for Beijing

Alienation · Beijing · Brain drain · Business · China · Development economics · Economic growth · Economics · Foreign policy · Political science · Politics · Global Education and Multiculturalism · Global Educational Reforms and Inequalities · Higher Education Governance and Development · Law

• Brain drain from Chinese universities in the 1990s

  Yan Zhou, Zhou Yan•Journal of Contemporary China•1998

  Add to list

• The Brain Drain from Five Developing Countries

  Subbiah Kannappan•International Migration Review•1973

  Add to list

• Education and Emigration

  Paul A Heist, Paul Heist et al.•American Educational Research…•1973

  Add to list

• The Brain Drain

  William A Glaser•Population and Development Review•1979

  Add to list