Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Discussion of 'US Global Strategy in the Post-Cold War Era

Bibliographic Data

ID12422367
AuthorsF Tomasson Jannuzi (corresponding author), Frank Jannuzi
Year2001
Volume10
Issue27
Pages317-320
Publication date2001-05-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueJournal of Contemporary China (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1067-0564 • E-ISSN: 1469-9400
PublisherRoutledge (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/10670560120045797
OpenAlexW2140323694
LanguageEN

This response to Jin Canrong's paper about US post-Cold War global strategy focuses on the concerns of both authors that the current 'three pillars strategy' is a source of growing tension in PRC‐US relations, leading to Chinese perceptions that ideological factors (US idealism) are playing a bigger role in US policymaking. Despite this, Jannuzi searches for common ground, focusing on issues areas, such as Cambodia, where China has found US idealism to be useful and helpful. He argues also that, as China joins more international treaties and regimes, Chinese and American interests will start to converge, although he concedes that the Kosovo intervention has caused ambivalence in China about unrestrained US 'idealism

Ambivalence · China · Cold war · Common ground · Epistemology · Idealism · Ideology · International relations · Intervention (counseling · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Sociology · International Relations and Foreign Policy · Law · Philosophy · Psychology · Social Psychology

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae