Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Social Questions, Medical Answers

Contesting British Abortion Law

Bibliographic Data

ID12425935
AuthorsFrances Amery (University of Birmingham, corresponding author)
Year2013
Volume21
Issue1
Pages26-49
Publication date2013-04-21
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueSocial Politics International Studies in Gender State & Society (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1072-4745 • E-ISSN: 1468-2893
PublisherOxford University Press (OUP) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1093/sp/jxt003
OpenAlexW2153382912
LanguageEN
Citations received5
References cited17

The 1967 Abortion Act, rather than granting women a ‘right’ to abortion, further entrenched medical power over women's reproductive capacities. Critiques of the Act have assumed that this process was uncomplicated for state actors, who had no qualms about this dispersal of power, and for the medical profession, which stepped in to fill this new regulatory role without question. This article argues that the medicalization of abortion was a fraught and incomplete process involving fundamental tensions over doctors’ responsibilities. It links medicalization to a process of governmentalization which requires constant renegotiation of the identities of doctors, women, and fetuses

Abortion · Medicalization · Political science · Power (physics · Pregnancy · Psychiatry · Sociology · State (computer science · American Constitutional Law and Politics · Historical Psychiatry and Medical Practices · Historical Studies on Reproduction, Gender, Health, and Societal Changes · Medicine · Law

  • Abortion, decriminalisation and the medico-legal paradigm

    Open Access•Erica Millar•Social Science & Medicine•2024

  • Transgressing biomedical and legal boundaries

    Open Access•Rishita Nandagiri, Lucía Berro Pizzarossa•Women s Studies International Forum•2023

  • Solving the ‘Woman Problem’ in British Abortion Politics

    Open Access•Fran Amery•The British Journal of Politics…•2014

  • Lost in the Process? The impact of devolution on abortion law in the United Kingdom

    Open Access•David Moon, Jennifer Thompson et al.•The British Journal of Politics…•2019

  • Doctors’ Rights vs. Patients’ Rights

    Open Access•Danielle Pullan•Social Politics International…•2025

  • Feminism, citizenship, and radical democratic politics

    Open Access•Chantal Mouffe•Social Postmodernism•1995

  • Reassessing Foucault

    Colin Jones, Roy Sydney Porter•Reassessing Foucault•1994

  • The Subject and Power

    Michel Foucault•Critical Inquiry•1982

  • Nietzsche, Genealogy, History

    Michel Foucault•Language, Counter-Memory, Practice•2019

  • Foucault, Health and Medicine

    Robin Bunton, Alan Petersen•Foucault, Health and Medicine•2002

  • The Work of Antidepressants

    Open Access•Elizabeth A Wilson, Elizabeth Wilson•BioSocieties•2006

  • Women, health and the sexual division of labour

    Open Access•L Doyal•Critical Social Policy•1983

  • Party Rules, OK

    P Cowley, Mark Stuart•Parliamentary Affairs•2010

  • Political power beyond the State

    Nikolas Rose, Peter Miller•British Journal of Sociology•1992

  • Structure and struggle

    Open Access•Carole Craddock, M D Reid et al.•Social Science & Medicine•1993

  • Medicine as an Institution of Social Control

    Open Access•Irving Kenneth Zola•The Sociological Review•1972

  • Foucault among the Sociologists

    Jan Goldstein•History and Theory•1984

  • The rise of surveillance medicine

    Open Access•David Armstrong•Sociology of Health & Illness•1995

Unique citing works5
Citations per year0,42
Citation span2014 - 2025 (12)
Citation velocityrecent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 5

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae