Crisis management policy. How discourses shape academic-political actors
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 12427779 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Jens Maeße (University of Warwick, corresponding author) |
| Editors | Tanweer Ali (0000-0002-1959-0480) |
| Year | 2015 |
| Volume | 23 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 231-245 |
| Publication date | 2015-08-07 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | On the Horizon The International Journal of Learning Futures (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1074-8121 • E-ISSN: 2054-1708 |
| Publisher | Emerald Publishing Limited (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1108/oth-05-2015-0016 |
| OpenAlex | W1538862312 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 3 |
| References cited | 22 |
Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to contribute to a discourse analytical understanding of the political economy. The term “crisis” is an important label in recent discussion in political economy. Yet the genuine discursive dimension of “the crisis” and the multiple linguistic layers of the crisis discourse remains an open issue. Design/methodology/approach – Realist perspectives usually believe in an external reality of crises independent of the language construction; in contrast, constructivist perspectives argue that a crisis is always the result of a socio-linguistic construction process. This contribution follows a critical-constructivist perspective, thereby taking into account powerful discursive actors which are able to “declare” a state in the world as a “crisis”. Findings – From a discourse analytical point of view, this paper examines the rules and logics of crisis management policy, arguing that a new politico-academic elite has appeared which is beyond the classical distinction between “Keynesians” and “neo-liberals”. By taking a position in the discourse of the recent debate on financial regulation, these new elite might be able to manage the crisis for a particular time, as they are constructed as “moderating actors” through academic and political discourses. Research limitations/implications – From a practical point of view, this analysis cannot offer economic solutions; from an analytical viewpoint, it will not give insights into discursive contexts. Practical implications – This analysis helps to understand current debates on economic policy and to improve the communicative efficiency of the participants. Originality/value – This paper combines a discourse analysis with a governmentality perspective and applies this analytical tool onto a political and economic topic currently prevailing in the global political economy
Critical discourse analysis · Discourse analysis · Economics · Elite · Epistemology · Governmentality · Ideology · Linguistics · Originality · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Positive economics · Qualitative research · Social science · Sociology · Value (mathematics · Global Financial Regulation and Crises · Housing, Finance, and Neoliberalism · Law · Political and Economic history of UK and US
Manias, Panics and Crashes
From Economics Imperialism to Freakonomics
Mr. Keynes and the "Classics"; A Suggested Interpretation
The laws of the markets
The long twentieth century
An Engine, Not a Camera
Conclusion
The Political Power of Economic Ideas
Economic Action and Social Structure
Economic experts
Sleeping with the enemy? On Hayek, constructivist thought, and the current economic crisis
Keynesian Economics
Identity and Control
Money/Space
From the many voices to the subject positions in anti-globalization discourse
Theories of Markets and Theories of Society
The Construction of a Global Profession
Cooling Out the Marks
Economics invents the economy
| Unique citing works | 3 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,33 |
| Citation span | 2017 - 2022 (6) |
| Citation velocity | historical |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 3 |