Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Examining the behavioral determinants of AI adoption in higher education

A focus on perceptional factors and demographic differences

Bibliographic Data

ID12428512
AuthorsAnum Zahid Syed (IQRA University Department of Education, , Karachi, corresponding author), Zeeshan Hyder Memon (Houston Community College Department of International Business, , Houston, Texas), Kamran Khan (0000-0001-9963-0616, DHA Suffa University Faculty of Management Sciences, , Karachi), I Hameed (0000-0002-1484-6133, Taylor’s University Faculty of Social Sciences and Leisure Management, School of Media and Communication, , Selangor), Midhat Nadeem (Institute of Business Management College of Business Management, , Karachi)
Year2025
Volume33
Issue2
Pages245-264
Publication date2025-04-17
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueOn the Horizon The International Journal of Learning Futures (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1074-8121 • E-ISSN: 2054-1708
PublisherEmerald Publishing Limited (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1108/oth-02-2025-0019
OpenAlexW4409555347
LanguageEN
Citations received1
References cited70

Purpose Artificial intelligence (AI) has seen considerable growth recently and is denoted as an emerging technology, particularly in educational settings. This study aims to explain the students’ perceptions and behavioral factors in adopting AI. This paper utilized gender and country differences to explore the adoption patterns influenced by perceptual and behavioral factors, including AI literacy, AI anxiety, AI self-efficacy, relevance, and perceived enjoyment. Design/methodology/approach A survey was conducted on Malaysian students using purposive sampling. The finalized sample of 391 respondents was tested using MS Excel, SPSS and SmartPLS to obtain the results. Moreover, to observe the differences, this paper used multigroup analysis based on gender and country. Findings This paper found that the theoretical factors strongly influence the intention of students to adopt AI in higher education. AI anxiety, AI self-efficacy and perceived enjoyment affect ease of use (PEOU). AI literacy, PEOU, relevance and subjective norms influence perceived usefulness (PU). In addition, both PU and PEOU shape students’ attitudes and intentions to adopt AI in their learning. Originality/value The use of AI has garnered significant attention from both consumers and organizations. This study specifically focuses on students, shedding light on the perceptual, behavioral and social factors influencing AI adoption in higher education

Focus (optics · Digital Marketing and Social Media · Impact of AI and Big Data on Business and Society · Psychology · Technology Adoption and User Behaviour

  • Empowered by AI

    Open Access•Nguyen Thi Thao Ho, Ha Van Le•Acta Psychologica•2026

  • Predicting and Changing Behavior

    Martin Fishbein, Icek Ajzen•Predicting and Changing Behavior•2011

  • Unpacking teachers’ intentions to integrate technology

    Open Access•Ronny Scherer, Timothy Teo•Educational Research Review•2019

  • Embracing the future of Artificial Intelligence in the classroom

    Open Access•Yoshija Walter•International Journal of…•2024

  • Application of Social Cognitive Theory to Training for Computer Skills

    Deborah R Compeau, Deborah Compeau et al.•Information Systems Research•1995

  • Lateral Collinearity and Misleading Results in Variance-Based SEM

    Ned Kock, Gary S Lynn et al.•Journal of the Association for…•2012

  • The effect of generative artificial intelligence (AI)-based tool use on students' computational thinking skills, programming self-efficacy and motivation

    Open Access•Ramazan Yılmaz, Fatma Gizem Karaoğlan Yılmaz et al.•Computers and Education:…•2023

  • Education for AI, not AI for Education

    Open Access•Daniel S Schiff•International Journal of…•2022

  • Determinants of Perceived Ease of Use

    Vivek Venkatesh, Viswanath Venkatesh•Information Systems Research•2000

  • Acceptance of artificial intelligence among pre-service teachers

    Open Access•Chengming Zhang, Jessica Schießl et al.•International Journal of…•2023

  • A comprehensive AI policy education framework for university teaching and learning

    Open Access•Cecilia K Y Chan•International Journal of…•2023

  • AI Anxiety

    Open Access•Deborah G Johnson, Mario Verdicchio•Journal of the Association for…•2017

  • An Introduction to Structural Equation Modeling

    Open Access•Joseph F Hair, G Tomas M Hult et al.•Partial Least Squares Structural…•2021

  • Student perspectives on the use of generative artificial intelligence technologies in higher education

    Open Access•Heather Johnston, Rebecca Wells et al.•International Journal for…•2024

  • Educational Technology Adoption

    Open Access•Andrina Granić•Education and Information…•2022

  • The theory of planned behavior

    Open Access•Icek Ajzen•Organizational Behavior and Human…•1991

  • Technology Acceptance Model 3 and a Research Agenda on Interventions

    Open Access•Vivek Venkatesh, Viswanath Venkatesh et al.•Decision Sciences•2008

  • Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology

    Fred D Davis•MIS Quarterly•1989

  • Modeling Teachers’ Acceptance of Generative Artificial Intelligence Use in Higher Education

    Open Access•Ahlam Mohammed Al-Abdullatif•Education Sciences•2024

  • Artificial Intelligence in Higher Education

    Open Access•Dongmin Ma, Huma Akram et al.•The International Review of…•2024

  • What drives students’ AI learning behavior

    Open Access•Yu-Min Wang, Chung-Lun Wei et al.•Interactive Learning Environments•2022

  • The use of data analytics technique in learning management system to develop fashion design skills and technology acceptance

    Abdellah Ibrahim Mohammed Elfeky, Marwa Yasien Helmy Elbyaly•Interactive Learning Environments•2023

  • Secondary school students’ intentions to learn AI

    Open Access•Chai Ching Sing, Timothy Teo et al.•Educational Technology Research…•2022

  • Chat-GPT; validating Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) in education sector via ubiquitous learning mechanism

    Open Access•Naveed Saif, Sajid Ullah Khan et al.•Computers in Human Behavior•2024

  • Technology acceptance theories and factors influencing artificial Intelligence-based intelligent products

    Open Access•Kwonsang Sohn, Ohbyung Kwon•Telematics and Informatics•2020

  • AI as a friend or assistant

    Open Access•Jihyun Kim, Kelly Merrill Jr et al.•Telematics and Informatics•2021

  • State of the art and practice in AI in education

    Open Access•William Holmes, Ilkka Tuomi•European Journal of Education•2022

  • Design and validation of the AI literacy questionnaire

    Open Access•Davy Tsz Kit Ng, Wenjie Wu et al.•British Journal of Educational…•2024

  • Do normative triggers and motivations influence the intention to purchase organic food? An application of the goal-framing theory

    Open Access•Kamran Khan, I Hameed et al.•British Food Journal•2023

  • Development and validation of an artificial intelligence anxiety scale

    Open Access•Yuyin Wang, Yu-Yin Wang et al.•Interactive Learning Environments•2019

  • Factors affecting the adoption and use of AVR technology in higher and tertiary education

    Open Access•Cyncia Matsika, Munyaradzi Zhou•Technology in Society•2021

Unique citing works1
Citations per year1
Citation span2026 - 2026 (1)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 1

Tools

Open DOI
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae