Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

From nanotesla to picotesla — A new window for magnetic prospecting in archaeology

The Picotesla for Magnetic Prospecting

Bibliographic Data

ID12429573
AuthorsHelmut Becker (Bayerisches Landesamt für Denkmalpflege, corresponding author)
Year1995
Volume2
Issue4
Pages217-228
Publication date1995-12-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueArchaeological Prospection (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1075-2196 • E-ISSN: 1099-0763
PublisherWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1002/1099-0763(199512)2:4<217::aid-arp6140020405>3.0.co;2-u
OpenAlexW1497653339
LanguageEN
Citations received37

The first use of a picotesla (1 pT = 0.001 nanotesla) sensitivity on the ground is reported for magnetic prospecting in archaeology. The instrument consists of two caesium magnetometers, CS2 (Scintrex, Canada), and a magnetometer processor, MEP720 (Picodas, Canada), which is interfaced to a subnotebook computer for control and data logging. Time mode sampling every 0.1 s allows resampling at 10 cm intervals. Digital image processing techniques are used for the visualization of data. The system opens a new window for magnetic prospecting in archaeology, especially by detecting archaeological structures with an extremely weak magnetization contrast, caused by biogenic magnetite

Archaeology · Computer vision · Geography · Magnetic anomaly · Magnetic field · Magnetic survey · Magnetite · Magnetometer · Mineralogy · Mining engineering · Physics · Prospecting · Remote sensing · Resampling · Sampling (signal processing · Visualization · Window (computing · Computer Science · Geomagnetism and Paleomagnetism Studies · Geophysical and Geoelectrical Methods · Image Processing and 3D Reconstruction · Artificial Intelligence · Geology · Geophysics · Paleontology

  • An Overview of Geophysical Techniques and Their Potential Suitability for Archaeological Studies

    Open Access•Raffaele Martorana, Patrizia Capizzi et al.•Heritage•2023

  • Regional patterns, local techniques. Remote sensing and archaeology at prehispanic site of San Isidro, El Salvador

    Open Access•Jan Szymański, Krzysztof Misiewicz et al.•Journal of Archaeological Science…•2022

  • At the equator

    Open Access•Armin Schmidt, Robin Coningham et al.•ArchéoSciences•2009

  • Magnetometry in archaeology – from theory to practice

    Jorg W E Fassbinder, Jörg Fassbinder•Rossiiskaia arkheologiia•2019

  • Remote Sensing and Geophysical Prospection

    Open Access•Armin Schmidt•Internet Archaeology•2004

  • Initial results using GPS navigation with the Foerster magnetometer system at the World Heritage site of Cyrene, Libya

    Open Access•Chris Gaffney, Vincent Gaffney et al.•Archaeological Prospection•2008

  • Geophysical Prospection in the Southern Harz Mountains, Germany

    Open Access•Burkart Ullrich, Georg Kaufmann et al.•Archaeological Prospection•2011

  • A review of the use of geophysical archaeological prospection in Sweden

    Open Access•Andreas Viberg, Immo Trinks et al.•Archaeological Prospection•2011

  • Use of Edge Delineating Methods in Interpreting Magnetic Archaeological Prospection Data

    Open Access•Alexandros Stampolidis, Gregory N Tsokas et al.•Archaeological Prospection•2012

  • A superconducting quantum interference device system for geomagnetic archaeometry

    Open Access•V Schultze, A Chwala et al.•Archaeological Prospection•2007

  • Advances in Reconstructing Archaeological Magnetic Signals; an Algorithm for Filtering Noise due to the Ploughing Effect

    Open Access•Mariangela Noviello, Marcello Ciminale et al.•Archaeological Prospection•2016

  • Integrated Geophysical and Archaeological Investigations of Aquinum in Frosinone, Italy

    Open Access•Salvatore Piro, Giuseppe Ceraudo et al.•Archaeological Prospection•2011

  • Quantitative Interpretation of Magnetic Anomalies from Thick Bed, Horizontal Plate and Intermediate Models Under Complex Physical‐Geological Environments in Archaeological Prospection

    Open Access•Lev Eppelbaum, Lev V Eppelbaum•Archaeological Prospection•2015

  • Efficient, large‐scale archaeological prospection using a true three‐dimensional ground‐penetrating Radar Array system

    Open Access•Immo Trinks, Bernth Johansson et al.•Archaeological Prospection•2010

  • Magnetic survey at Venta Icenorum , Caistor St Edmund

    Open Access•David Bescoby, William Bowden et al.•Archaeological Prospection•2009

  • Integrated technologies for archaeological investigation; the Celone Valley project

    Open Access•Marcello Ciminale, Helmut Becker et al.•Archaeological Prospection•2007

  • On‐site non‐destructive determination of the remanent magnetization of archaeological finds using field magnetometers

    Open Access•Tina Wunderlich, Raphael Kahn et al.•Archaeological Prospection•2021

  • Recent results from the English Heritage caesium magnetometer system in comparison with recent fluxgate gradiometers

    Open Access•Neil Linford, Paul Linford et al.•Archaeological Prospection•2007

  • Rapid and sensitive magnetometer surveys of large areas using SQUIDs – the measurement system and its application to the Niederzimmern Neolithic double‐ring ditch exploration

    Open Access•V Schultze, Linzen et al.•Archaeological Prospection•2008

  • Magnetic Prospecting for the Archaeology of Classe (Ravenna)

    Open Access•Federica Boschi•Archaeological Prospection•2012

  • A Multidisciplinary Approach to Reveal and Interpret ‘Missing’ Archaeological Features at the Masseria Pantano Site in Apulia (Southern Italy)

    Open Access•Massimo Caldara, Marcello Ciminale et al.•Archaeological Prospection•2014

  • Prompt magnetic investigations of archaeological remains in areas of infrastructure development

    Open Access•Lev Eppelbaum, Lev V Eppelbaum et al.•Archaeological Prospection•2001

  • Contributions of Multi‐Method Geophysical Survey to Archaeological Research at the Battlefield of Waterloo

    Open Access•Duncan Williams, Dominique Bosquet et al.•Archaeological Prospection•2024

  • Georadar in the Roman civil town Carnuntum, Austria

    Open Access•Wolfgang Neubauer, Alois Hinterleitner et al.•Archaeological Prospection•2002

  • A Late Holocene case study from south‐west France

    Open Access•Marie Larcanché, Cécile Verdet et al.•Archaeological Prospection•2023

  • Assessment of the Effect of Instrumental and Discretization Errors on Derivative‐based Potential‐field Geophysical Methods

    Open Access•Christian M Milea, C B PAPAZACHOS et al.•Archaeological Prospection•2012

  • Complex attributes of the magnetic signal for multiple sources

    Open Access•Christian M Milea, Richard O Hansen et al.•Archaeological Prospection•2010

  • Combined application of pansharpening and enhancement methods to improve archaeological cropmark visibility and identification in QuickBird imagery

    Open Access•Mariangela Noviello, Marcello Ciminale et al.•Journal of Archaeological Science•2013

  • Seeing beneath the farmland, steppe and desert soil

    Open Access•Jorg W E Fassbinder•Journal of Archaeological Science•2015

  • Geophysical Survey as an Aid to Excavation at Mitrou

    Gregory N Tsokas Gregory N Tsokas, Gregory N Tsokas et al.•Hesperia The Journal of the…•2012

  • Detecting Trends in the Prediction of the Buried Past

    Open Access•Chris Gaffney•Archaeometry•2008

  • Corneşti-Iarcuri - a Bronze Age town in the Romanian Banat

    Open Access•Alexandru Szentmiklosi, Bernhard S Heeb et al.•Antiquity•2011

  • Current Practices in Archaeogeophysics

    Kenneth L Kvamme•Earth Sciences and Archaeology•2001

  • Quantitative integration of geophysical methods for archaeological prospection

    Open Access•Salvatore Piro, Paolo Mauriello et al.•Archaeological Prospection•2000

  • On the use of complex attributes and the inferred source parameter estimates in the exploration of archaeological sites

    Open Access•Gregory N Tsokas, R O HANSEN•Archaeological Prospection•2000

  • On the use of complex attributes and the inferred source parameter estimates in the exploration of archaeological sites

    Open Access•Gregory N Tsokas, R O HANSEN•Archaeological Prospection•2000

  • Non-destructive exploration in the Archaeological Park of Metaponto (Southern Italy)

    Open Access•Marcello Ciminale, E Ricchetti•Archaeological Prospection•1999

Unique citing works37
Citations per year1,37
Citation span1999 - 2024 (26)
Citation velocityrecent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 33

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae