Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Archaeological prospection of a prehistoric lithic workshop site using ground penetrating radar with a high‐frequency antenna unit

Bibliographic Data

ID12429583
AuthorsPavel Ryazantsev (0000-0002-1944-9479, Institute of Geology of the Karelian Research Centre Russian Academy of Sciences 11 Pushkinskay St Petrozavodsk 185035 Russia, corresponding author), Aleksey Tarasov (Institute of Linguistics, Literature and History of the Karelian Research Centre Russian Academy of Sciences 11 Pushkinskay St Petrozavodsk 185035 Russia), Maksim Potakhin (0000-0002-2630-2176, Northern Water Problems Institute of the Karelian Research Centre Russian Academy of Sciences 50 Alexander Nevsky Av Petrozavodsk 185030 Russia)
Year2023
Volume30
Issue3
Pages341-355
Publication date2023-02-08
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueArchaeological Prospection (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1075-2196 • E-ISSN: 1099-0763
PublisherWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1002/arp.1896
OpenAlexW4319787030
LanguageEN
Citations received1
References cited57

We surveyed in detail the Chalcolithic lithic workshop Fofanovo XIII an East Fennoscandian region by ground‐penetrating radar (GPR). A high‐frequency antenna unit was applied to map small‐scale features, mainly waste flakes. To substantiate the efficiency of the GPR technique, we performed a primary analysis of a set of equivalent models in a sandbox. The laboratory‐scale GPR investigation highlights differences in GPR patterns depending on the spatial arrangement of small features and supports the further interpretation of real‐life data. The GPR survey in the field covered 2200 m 2 , revealing areas with a high density of artefacts in the cultural layer and locating individual structural elements of the Fofanovo XIII archaeological site. We suggested using microdebitage samples from manual probing to verify the detected anomalous values of GPR attributes. The results point to a significant correlation between microdebitage and the envelope peak amplitude of the echo signal. Ultimately, our study confirmed the cultural layer in the Fofanovo XIII workshop site to be rich in lithic production wastes, indicating it was a place of mass‐scale production of lithic chopping tools

Antenna (radio) · Archaeology · Cartography · Geography · Geophysical survey · Ground-Penetrating Radar · Lithology · Prehistory · Radar · Remote sensing · Scale (ratio · Engineering · Geophysical Methods and Applications · Rock Mechanics and Modeling · Seismic Waves and Analysis · Geology · Geophysics · Paleontology

  • Decoding the stone Buddha

    Open Access•Junkai Ge, Huaifeng Sun et al.•Journal of Cultural Heritage•2025

  • The Role of Debitage Size in Assessing the Spatial Organization of Lithic Production. The Case of Lake Onega Axe and Adze Workshops (Russia)

    A Tarasov, Mikhail Zobkov et al.•Lithic Technology•2020

  • Detecting Trends in the Prediction of the Buried Past

    Open Access•Chris Gaffney•Archaeometry•2008

  • Radiocarbon chronology of the Neolithic-Eneolithic period in the Karelian Republic (Russia)

    Open Access•Alexey Yur'Evich Tarasov, Kerkko Nordqvist et al.•Documenta Praehistorica•2017

  • Reconsidered Late Mesolithic and Early Neolithic of the Lithuanian Coast

    Open Access•Gytis Piličiauskas, Heidi Luik et al.•Estonian Journal of Archaeology•2015

  • Geophysics and preventive archaeology

    Open Access•Guillaume Hulin, Didier Bayard et al.•Archaeological Prospection•2018

  • Large‐scale geophysical archaeological prospection pilot study at Viking Age and medieval sites in west Jutland, Denmark

    Open Access•Roland Filzwieser, Lis Helles Olesen et al.•Archaeological Prospection•2017

  • The study and characterization of Emperor Traiano's Villa (Altopiani di Arcinazzo, Roma) using high‐resolution integrated geophysical surveys

    Open Access•Salvatore Piro, Dean Goodman et al.•Archaeological Prospection•2003

  • Ground penetrating radar surveys in the archaeological area of Augusta Bagiennorum

    Open Access•Chiara Colombero, Cesare Comina et al.•Archaeological Prospection•2021

  • The role of integrated geophysical survey methods in the assessment of archaeological landscapes

    Open Access•Simon Keay, Graeme Earl et al.•Archaeological Prospection•2009

  • An integrated geophysical and archaeological approach to the study of the Late Medieval castle in Żelechów in Mazovia, Poland

    Open Access•Wojciech Bis, Tomasz Herbich et al.•Archaeological Prospection•2021

  • First High‐resolution GPR and Magnetic Archaeological Prospection at the Viking Age Settlement of Birka in Sweden

    Open Access•Immo Trinks, Wolfgang Neubauer et al.•Archaeological Prospection•2014

  • Large‐area high‐resolution ground‐penetrating radar measurements for archaeological prospection

    Open Access•Immo Trinks, Alois Hinterleitner et al.•Archaeological Prospection•2018

  • Reconstructing the palaeoenvironment at the early Mesolithic site of Lake Duvensee

    Open Access•Erica Corradini, Dennis Wilken et al.•The Holocene•2020

  • Artifact size and spatial process

    Open Access•Sarah C Sherwood, Jan F Simek et al.•Geoarchaeology•1995

  • Geophysical assessment of Verteba Cave Eneolithic site, Ukraine

    Open Access•K Bondar, Mykhailo P Sokhatskyi et al.•Geoarchaeology•2020

  • Microartifact Analysis

    Lara Homsey-Messer, Anthony L Ortmann et al.•Southeastern Archaeology•2016

  • In much smaller things forgotten

    Phyllis S Johnson, James C Pritchard et al.•Southeastern Archaeology•2016

  • Investigating archaeological looting using satellite images and Georadar

    Open Access•R Lasaponara, Giovanni Leucci et al.•Journal of Archaeological Science•2013

  • Archaeological prospection of a high altitude Neolithic site in the Arctic mountain tundra region of northern Sweden

    Open Access•Andreas Viberg, Annika Berntsson et al.•Journal of Archaeological Science•2013

  • Improved high-resolution GPR imaging and characterization of prehistoric archaeological features by means of attribute analysis

    Open Access•Wenke Zhao, Emanuele Forte et al.•Journal of Archaeological Science•2014

  • A Regional Approach to Ancient Urban Studies in Greece Through Multi-Settlement Geophysical Survey

    Open Access•Jamieson C Donati, Apostolos Sarris et al.•Journal of Field Archaeology•2017

  • Out of the Peat

    Satu Koivisto, Niko Latvakoski et al.•Journal of Field Archaeology•2018

  • Halls at Borre

    Open Access•Christer Tonning, Petra Schneidhofer et al.•Antiquity•2020

  • Made for exchange

    Open Access•A Tarasov, Kerkko Nordqvist•Antiquity•2022

  • Technical and Morphological Model of Chalcolithic Chopping Tools of the Russian-Karelian Type From Karelia and the Upper Volga Region

    Open Access•A Tarasov, A Y Tarasov•Archaeology Ethnology and…•2017

  • Palaeoenvironmental analysis of large-scale, high-resolution GPR and magnetometry data sets

    Open Access•Petra Schneidhofer, Erich Nau et al.•Archaeological and Anthropological…•2017

  • Another Look at Small Debitage and Microdebitage

    John E Clark•Lithic Technology•1986

  • Identification of Cultural Site Formation Processes through Microdebitage Analysis

    Open Access•Kathleen L Hull•American Antiquity•1987

Unique citing works1
Citations per year1
Citation span2025 - 2025 (1)
Citation velocityrecent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 1

Tools

Open DOI
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae